Vikash Kumar Sah Vs The State of Bihar

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md Shadab Alam Wazdi, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Choubey Jawahar, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 20-05-2026

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State through virtual mode.

¶14

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with S.T. Excise No. 196 of 2024 arising out of Bhimpur P.S. Case No. 20 of 2024 dated 19.02.2024 registered for the offence punishable under Section/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018.

¶15

As per the prosecution case, the police have recovered total 108 liters of illicit Nepali Desi Dilwale Sophie liquor from the motorcycle bearing Regd. No. BR38H3412.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the instant case. It is next submitted that the motorcycle, from which alleged recovery of seized article has been made by the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33764 of 2026(2) dt.20-05-2026 2/3

¶18

police, was sold out by the petitioner to Maa Ambay Auto and the agreement and statutory form-29 for transfer of vehicle, duly signed by this petitioner as per Rule 55 of the Motor Vehicle Act, have also been appended with the instant anticipatory bail application to show his bonafide that the petitioner is in no way connected with the allegations and, as also, the seizure so made. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has clean antecedent and whatever allegation is leveled against this petitioner is attributable to the owner of Maa Ambay Auto, who is said to have entered into an agreement on 20^th February, 2023.

¶19

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.

¶20

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the motorcycle from which the recovery is said to have been made was sold out to the owner of Maa Ambay Auto on 20^th of February, 2023 and, as also, the petitioner having no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner, above named, be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/(rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Judge-1,

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33764 of 2026(2) dt.20-05-2026 3/3

¶22

Supaul in connection with S.T. Excise No. 196 of 2024 arising out of Bhimpur P.S. Case No. 20 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. as well as the following conditions:

¶23

(i) One of the bailors should be the family member/relative/known of the petitioner(s) who shall provide official document / personal affidavit to show his/her bona fide;

¶24

(ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

¶25

(iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds.

¶26

(Ajit Kumar, J)

¶27

rishi/-

¶28

U T

Vikash Kumar Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikash Kumar Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikram kumar Paswan @ Vikram kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rudal Ram @ Rahul Kumar @ Rudal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ruby Devi @ Rubi Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Munna Chaudhary @ Muna Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Arun Kumar Rai @ Arun Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Radha Rai Vs The State of Bihar