Dismissed¶21

Immamuddin Miyan @ Golu v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC11 May 2026CR. MISC./29396/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; Criminal Miscellaneous No.29396 of 2026; decided 11-05-2026; Sandeep Kumar, J.; bail application dismissed; Harsidhi/Harsiddhi P.S. Case No. 590 of 2025; East Champaran; Sections 74, 87, 140 and 3(5); Section 8/12 POCSO Act; Section 183 BNSS victim statement; kidnapping of minor girl kept two months; petitioner in custody since 29.10.2025; Krishna Kant Singh for petitioner; Uday Pratap Singh APP for State; no opinion expressed on merits.

What did the court decide?

Considering the nature of allegation and the statement of the victim girl, the Court was not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. ¶20

Immamuddin Miyan @ Golu Vs The State of Bihar — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29396 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-590 Year-2025 Thana- HARSIDHI District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Immamuddin Miyan @ Golu Son of Kamruddin Miyan Resident of VillageRanjeeta, P.S.- Harsidhi, District- East Champaran

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar bihar

¶8

X Wife of Y Resident of Village- Ranjeeta, Ward no. 15m P.S.- Harsidhi, District- East Champaran

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

======================================================

¶11

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Krishna Kant Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr.Uday Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 11-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Harsiddhi P.S. Case No. 590 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 74, 87, 140 and 3(5) to which later on Section 8/12 of the POCSO Act.

¶15

The petitioner and others are said to have kidnapped the victim.

¶16

The minor victim girl in her statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS has said that the petitioner and others had taken her somewhere and kept the victim for two months.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29396 of 2026(2) dt.11-05-2026 2/2

¶18

The petitioner is in custody since 29.10.2025.

¶19

Considering the nature of allegation and the

¶20

statement of the victim girl, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶21

Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

¶22

It is, however, clarified that the observations made

¶23

herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not express any opinion on the merits of the case.

¶24

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶25

P. Kumar

¶26

U T

Immamuddin Miyan @ Golu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Immamuddin Miyan @ Golu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shanti Kunwar @ Shanti Kuer Vs The State of Bihar

Krishna Kumar @ Krishn Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Horil Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Shravan Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Laltu Kumar @ Chintu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar