Dismissed¶21

Kanhaiya Kumar @ Gautam Kumar @ Gautam v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC28 Apr 2026CR. MISC./27613/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27613 of 2026; Justice Sandeep Kumar; order dated 28-04-2026; regular bail rejected; Section 392 Indian Penal Code; Rosera P.S. Case No. 85 of 2024, District Samastipur; gunpoint loot Rs. 3,88,210/-; implication via co-accused's self-inculpatory statement; custody since 04.10.2024; four similar and serious criminal antecedents as ground for refusal; prima facie observations disclaimer; petitioner Kanhaiya Kumar @ Gautam Kumar @ Gautam.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner has four similar and serious criminal antecedents and there exists prima facie material against him indicating his involvement in the commission of the offence. ¶17

Kanhaiya Kumar @ Gautam Kumar @ Gautam Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27613 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-85 Year-2024 Thana- ROSERA District- Samastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Kanhaiya Kumar @ Gautam Kumar @ Gautam Son of Upendra Panjiyar R/oKunna, P.S.- Bithan Bazar, Dist.- Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amit Ranjan, Advocate Mr. Pravin Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar No. 2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 28-04-2026

¶11

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶12

learned APP for the State.

¶13

2 . The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

¶14

Rosera P.S. Case No. 85 of 2024 registered for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

3 . As per the prosecution case, three unknown persons, at gunpoint, looted Rs. 3,88,210/- from the informant. During the investigation, the name of the petitioner has come in the case on the self-inculpatory statement of a co-accused.

¶16

4 . The petitioner is in custody since 04.10.2024 and

¶17

has four similar and serious criminal antecedents. There exists prima facie material against the petitioner indicating his involvement in the commission of the offence.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27613 of 2026(2) dt.28-04-2026 2/2

¶19

5 . Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of allegation and the criminal antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

¶20

6 . Accordingly, this application for regular bail stands

¶21

rejected.

¶22

7 . It is made clear that any observation made herein is prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any manner.

¶23

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶24

Shishir/-

¶25

U T

Kanhaiya Kumar @ Gautam Kumar @ Gautam v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kanhaiya Kumar @ Gautam Kumar @ Gautam v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sarif Ansari @ Sarif Mansuri Vs The State of Bihar

Saroj Ansari @ Khan Saheb @ Saroj Vs The State of Bihar

Gurudev Kumar @ Gurudev Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Nut Vs The State of Bihar

Jay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sagar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar