Allowed¶22

Jay Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC28 Apr 2026CR. MISC./27545/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail granted; Jay Kumar v. The State of Bihar; Patna High Court CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27545 of 2026; decided 28-04-2026 by Justice Sandeep Kumar; Bihta P.S. Case No. 63 of 2026; Sections 303(2), 317(2) BNS; stolen motorcycle recovered; custody since 20.01.2026; bail bond Rs. 10,000/- with two like sureties; condition of Sunday attendance at Bihta Police Station; cancellation of bail bonds on default; no opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court below in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 63 of 2026, subject to the condition of marking attendance at Bihta Police Station every Sunday, default inviting cancellation of bail bonds. ¶22

Jay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶22

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioner, in custody since 20.01.2026 in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 63 of 2026 (offence under Sections 303(2), 317(2) of the BNS), should be released on bail.

¶13

Court's answer

Considering the facts placed before it, the Court allowed the bail application.

¶18

Ratio / Principle

The petitioner is to be released on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court below in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 63 of 2026.

¶22

Key takeaways

As a condition of bail, the petitioner is directed to mark his attendance at Bihta Police Station on every Sunday of each month; default in appearance will result in cancellation of his bail bonds.ratio¶23
The observations in the order are limited to adjudication of the present bail application, shall not prejudice the petitioner at any subsequent stage of trial, and the Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.obiter¶24

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Patna High Court (Sandeep Kumar, J), order dated 28-04-2026 in CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27545 of 2026, allowed bail to Jay Kumar in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 63 of 2026, registered for offences under Sections 303(2), 317(2) of the BNS, in which one stolen motorcycle was said to have been recovered from him and he was in custody since 20.01.2026. Bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below, conditioned on the petitioner marking attendance at Bihta Police Station every Sunday, default inviting cancellation of bail bonds. The Court clarified that its observations were confined to the bail adjudication and expressed no opinion on the merits of the case.

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27545 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2026 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Jay Kumar S/o Vakil Ray @ Vakil Rai R/o Kanhauli, PS - Bihta, District - Patna.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bindu Kumari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 28-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 63 of 2026 registered for the offence under Sections 303(2), 317(2) of the BNS.

¶14

As per the prosecution case, one stolen motorcycle is said to have been recovered from the petitioner.

¶15

The petitioner is in custody since 20.01.2026.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

¶17

the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case.

¶18

Considering the aforesaid facts, this application

¶19

is allowed.

¶20

Let the petitioner, above named, be released on

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27545 of 2026(2) dt.28-04-2026 2/2

¶22

bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court below in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 63 of 2026.

¶23

As a condition of this order, the petitioner after being released on bail is directed to mark his attendance at Bihta Police Station on every Sunday of each month. Any default in appearance at the police station will result in cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶24

It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

¶25

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶26

Vikas/-

¶27

Jay Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jay Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sarif Ansari @ Sarif Mansuri Vs The State of Bihar

Saroj Ansari @ Khan Saheb @ Saroj Vs The State of Bihar

Gurudev Kumar @ Gurudev Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Nut Vs The State of Bihar

Kanhaiya Kumar @ Gautam Kumar @ Gautam Vs The State of Bihar

Sagar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar