Allowed¶22

Dipak Pradhan @ Deepak Pradhan v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Apr 2026CR. MISC./24729/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail — Section 309(4) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita — loot of gold and silver jewellery — Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24729 of 2026 — custody since 02.10.2025 — no TIP conducted — one antecedent — bail bonds Rs.10,000 with two sureties — Ansul, J — order dated 16-04-2026.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted; petitioner to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below in connection with ST No 59 of 2026 arising out of Sadar PS Case No. 482 of 2025. ¶22

Dipak Pradhan @ Deepak Pradhan Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24729 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-482 Year-2025 Thana- PURNEA SADAR District- Purnia

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Dipak Pradhan @ Deepak Pradhan Son of Isuful Pradhan @ Ishful Pradhan Resident of Mohalla - Dahisahi, Mund Mala, P.S.- Fonepur, District - Jaajbooz, Orissa.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bijendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANSUL

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 16-04-2026

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with ST No 59 of 2026 arising out of Sadar PS Case No. 482 of 2025 instituted for the offence punishable under Section 309 (4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita pending in the Court of learned District & Additional Sessions Judge X, Purnea.

¶16

The prosecution case is that the informant was looted with his belongings including the gold and silver jewellery by certain miscreants. The name of petitioner transpired in the case after two days on suspicion. No TIP has been conducted though the petitioner is in custody since 02.10.2025 and has one antecedent.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24729 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026 2/2

¶18

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

¶19

opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and

¶21

circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶22

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with ST No 59 of 2026 arising out of Sadar PS Case No. 482 of 2025.

¶23

(Ansul, J)

¶24

M.E.H./-

¶25

U T

Dipak Pradhan @ Deepak Pradhan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dipak Pradhan @ Deepak Pradhan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nitish Kumar Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Ajit Kumar @ Amarjit Kumar Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Javed Ekbal @ Md. Javed Ekbal @ Jabed Ekbal Vs The State of Bihar

Pappu Kumar @ Pappu Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Matheri Sharma @ Shivam Kumar Vs The State of Bihar