Nitish Kumar Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Jitendra Kumar Giri For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Priya Sharan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANSUL ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 07-04-2026

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP

¶13

for the State.

¶14

Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioners was rejected by this Court (Annexure P/1).

¶15

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Karjain PS Case No. 131 of 2024 (corresponding to ST No 62 of 2025) instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 140 (1), 140 (2) and 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge IV, Sapaul.

¶16

The prosecution case is that Suresh Mandal, the informant, lodged information with police alleging therein that on 29.08.2024, his brother Shyam Nandan Mandal left the house

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11485 of 2026(3) dt.07-04-2026 2/3

¶18

but he did not return. When he went to the house of Sheo Nandan Mandal, he saw that his vehicle was parked there. He states that prior to the same incident, Budhan Mandal, Sheo Narain Mandal, Shankar Mandal, Nitish Kumar Mandal, Chotu Mandal, Ramchandra Mandal and Kusheshwar Mandal had threatened that they would kill members of his family. The informant further asserted that a suit is also going on between his brother and the aforesaid persons with regard to the land dispute.

¶19

The person, namely, Shyam Nandan Mandal @ Parmanand Mandal is still traceless. The police, during investigation, neither could recover the dead body nor could gather any material against the petitioners except some telephonic talks on the basis of CDR.

¶20

The learned counsel for the petitioners has brought on record the photostat copy of Title Suit No 14 of 2023 wherein the informant is defendant No 2 and three of the co-accused, namely, Budhan Mdndal, Shyam Narain Mandal and Shankar Kumar Mandal are plaintiffs. The parties are claimed to be agnates.

¶21

The pendency of civil suit between the parties raises a bona fide doubt with regard to the implication as the same may

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11485 of 2026(3) dt.07-04-2026 3/3

¶23

also be based on land dispute and the names may have been inserted in the FIR because of that dispute. These observations are being made for limited purposes of bail and they should not effect any other adjudication connected with this case. The petitioners are in custody since 26.10.2024 with no criminal antecedent.

¶24

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

¶25

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, clean antecedents of the petitioners and the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

¶26

Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Karjain PS Case No. 131 of 2024 (corresponding to ST No 62 of 2025).

¶27

(Ansul, J)

¶28

M.E.H./-

¶29

U

Nitish Kumar Mandal v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nitish Kumar Mandal v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajit Kumar @ Amarjit Kumar Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Javed @ Dahadi Vs The State of Bihar

Pradeep Kumar Yadav @ Pradip Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Javed Ekbal @ Md. Javed Ekbal @ Jabed Ekbal Vs The State of Bihar

Pappu Kumar @ Pappu Paswan Vs The State of Bihar