Pawan Tiwary @ Pawan Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bibhakar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmanand Prasad ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 20-04-2026

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

A.P.P. for the State.

¶14

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 17 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. It is next submitted that petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and he came to be implicated based on the fact that he is owner of the motorcycle. It is next submitted that no prudent person would use his own vehicle for committing an occurrence and thus would create evidence against himself and hence would get

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24577 of 2026(2) dt.20-04-2026 2/3

¶17

implicated. It is further submitted that the petitioner was completely unaware that Mithilesh and Chatthu would misuse his vehicle in the manner as alleged, who were also apprehended from the spot.

¶18

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶19

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.500/- (Rupees five hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bahoranpur P.S. Case No.99/2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

¶20

It is made clear that the learned trial court thereafter shall verify the criminal antecedents of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case, in that event, it would be presumed that petitioner had concealed his antecedent before this court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed but if

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24577 of 2026(2) dt.20-04-2026 3/3

¶22

on verification it is found that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent, in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

¶23

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶24

amit/-

¶25

U T

Pawan Tiwary @ Pawan Tiwari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pawan Tiwary @ Pawan Tiwari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishna Mandal @ Kanhaiya Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Shankar Mukhiya Vs The State of Bihar

Rakesh Kumar Tiwari @ Mantoon Tiwari @ Mantoon Baba Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Jhapasi Manjhi @ Jhapshi Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar

Suraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar