Shivnath sahani Vs The State of Bihar

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16475 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-433 Year-2019 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Shivnath sahani Son of Late Santosh Sahani Resident of village- Chailaha, psBanjariya, Dist- East Champaran

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Aditya Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bishweshwar Ram ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶8

3 06-04-2026

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶10

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 35 litres of liquor along with 3000 kilograms of semi prepared liquor from a place near bank of a river. It is next submitted that petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even alleged recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner and is accessible to public at large and he came to be

¶12

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16475 of 2026(3) dt.06-04-2026 2/3

¶13

implicated based on secret information which is the easiest way to implicate someone without holding a proper investigation, when petitioner admittedly is a person with clean antecedent. It is also submitted that at times, the police in order to save the real culprit tried to implicate innocent people.

¶14

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶15

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.500/- (Rupees five hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Excise P.S. Case No.433/2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

¶16

It is made clear that the learned trial court thereafter shall verify the criminal antecedents of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case, in that event, it would be presumed that petitioner had concealed his antecedent before this court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed but if

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16475 of 2026(3) dt.06-04-2026 3/3

¶18

on verification it is found that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent, in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

¶19

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶20

amit/-

¶21

U T

Shivnath sahani v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shivnath sahani v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raj Bihari Singh Vs The State of Bihar, through the Add. Secretary

Guddu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sajal Kumar Sinha @ Mausam Vs The State of Bihar

Awdesh Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Vikram @ Bhutti @ Vikram Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rocky Raj @ Rocky Kumar Vs The State of Bihar