Allowed¶20

Sajal Kumar Sinha @ Mausam v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Apr 2026CR. MISC./21851/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Modification of order recording withdrawal of anticipatory bail application; correction of record from "arrested during pendency" to "withdrawn based on compromise"; Cr. Misc No. 2649 of 2026; PS Case No. 600/2023, Phulwari Sharif, Patna; Sajal Kumar Sinha @ Mausam v. The State of Bihar and Rahul Kumar; decided 03-04-2026 by Satyavrat Verma, J.

What did the court decide?

Modification of para-2 of the order dated 11-3-2026 in Cr. Misc No. 2649 of 2026 to read "Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application based on compromise". ¶20

Sajal Kumar Sinha @ Mausam Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21851 of 2026 In

¶2

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2649 of 2026

¶3

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-600 Year-2023 Thana- PHULWARISHARIF District- Patna

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Sajal Kumar Sinha @ Mausam S/o Sanjeev Kumar Sinha Resident of Ranipur, Post office and Police Station- Phulwari Sharif, District- Patna

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar

¶9

Rahul Kumar S/o Bhimsen Prasad R/o vill - Ranipur, P.O. and P.S.- Phulwari Sharif, Dist.- Patna

¶10

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Navin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 03-04-2026

¶14

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶15

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner had earlier moved before this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc No. 2649 of 2026. It is next submitted that Cr. Misc No. 2649 of 2026 was mentioned on 10-

¶16

2-2026 for taking it up out of turn as petitioner wanted to withdraw the anticipatory bail application since the case was compromised, accordingly the case was taken up on 11-3-2026, but in the order dated 11-3-2026 at para-2, it was recorded – “Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, as petitioner was

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21851 of 2026(2) dt.03-04-2026 2/2

¶18

arrested during pendency of the same.” It is further submitted that petitioner till date has not been arrested and intends to surrender based on compromise, as such it is prayed that para-2 of the order dated 11-3-2026 in Cr. Misc No. 2649 of 2026 be modified to read as “Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application based on compromise”.

¶19

3. In view of the submission made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, para-2 of the order dated 11-3-2026 in Cr. Misc No. 2649 of 2026 is modified to read as “Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application based on compromise”.

¶20

4. Accordingly, the instant modification application is allowed.

¶21

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶22

Sumit/-

¶23

U T

Sajal Kumar Sinha @ Mausam v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sajal Kumar Sinha @ Mausam v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammad Ehsan @ Md Ehsan @ Azam Vs The State of Bihar

Amit Kumar @ Amit Giri Vs The State of Bihar

Bhagya Narayan Thakur @ Bhagnarayan Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Raj Bihari Singh Vs The State of Bihar, through the Add. Secretary

Guddu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Chhotu Kumar Rai @ Sanjiv Kumar Rai Vs The State of Bihar