Allowed¶19

Virendra Yadav @ Virendra Singh @ Birendra Ydav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC10 Apr 2026CR. MISC./16410/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; Criminal Miscellaneous No.16410 of 2026; order dt. 10-04-2026; Justice Satyavrat Verma; regular bail; Section 30 Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act 2018; Sonversa/Sonebarsa P.S. Case No. 04 of 2026; District Buxar; recovery of 12.6 litres of liquor from open space; petitioner not arrested from spot; no conscious possession; implication by Chawkidar due to enmity; antecedent one Excise Act case; in custody since 15.02.2026; bail granted on bonds of Rs.5,000/- with two like sureties; A.P.P. opposed bail.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending in connection with Sonversa P.S. Case No. 04 of 2026. ¶19

Virendra Yadav @ Virendra Singh @ Birendra Ydav Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16410 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2026 Thana- SONEBARSA District- Buxar

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Virendra Yadav @ Virendra Singh @ Birendra Ydav S/o Late Gudani Yadav @ Gudani R/o vill - Girdharbrawon, P.S.- Sonversa, Distt.- Buxar

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Dr. (Mr.) Kamal Deo Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 10-04-2026

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶11

learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶12

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the

¶13

offence punishable under Section 30 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case under the Excise Act and allegation is of recovery of 12.6 litres of liquor from an open space.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even the alleged recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner. It is further submitted that petitioner came to be implicated at the instance of the Chawkidar with whom he is on an inimical

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16410 of 2026(2) dt.10-04-2026 2/2

¶17

term. It is next submitted that petitioner is in custody since 15.02.2026.

¶18

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

¶19

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending in connection with Sonversa P.S. Case No. 04 of 2026.

¶20

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶21

Kundan/-

¶22

U T

Virendra Yadav @ Virendra Singh @ Birendra Ydav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Virendra Yadav @ Virendra Singh @ Birendra Ydav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bimla Devi Vs the State of Bihar and Another

Mithu Sahni @ Mithu kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Mallik @ Sonu Malik Vs The State of Bihar

Chunnu Singh @ Monu Singh @ Manu Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Rishikant Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Manjit Kumar Thakur Vs The State of Bihar