Sonu Mallik @ Sonu Malik Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23450 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-2026 Thana- KAJI MUHAMMADPUR DistrictMuzaffarpur

======================================================

Sonu Mallik @ Sonu Malik Son of Late Bigan Mallik @ Bigan Ram Resident of Mohalla- Slam Basti, Aghoriya Bazar, P.S.- Kazimohammadpur, DistrictMuzaffarpur

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Hari Kishore Thakur For the Opposite Party/s : Ms.Suman Kumari Singh ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 09-04-2026

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act.

¶14

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of three cases out of which two cases are under the Excise Act and allegation is of recovery of 25.540 litres of liquor from the house of the petitioner.

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even the house in question is a joint family property and thus, it cannot be alleged

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23450 of 2026(2) dt.09-04-2026 2/3

¶17

with certainty that it was the petitioner, who had kept the liquor in the house or the liquor kept in the house was within his knowledge and after Amendment in the Excise Act, 2018, the concept of deemed possession and presumed offender has been done away with and he came to be implicated at the instance of local person, but the name of the person, who disclosed the name of the petitioner is not disclosed in the F.I.R., which casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution. It is also submitted that it absolutely does not stand to reason that how local person would know who had concealed the liquor.

¶18

Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.

¶19

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on provisional anticipatory bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Kazimohammadpur P. S. Case No.23 of 2026, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23450 of 2026(2) dt.09-04-2026 3/3

¶21

7. The application stands allowed.

¶22

It is made clear that the learned trial Court after

¶23

accepting the provisional bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event, if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than three cases, then it would be presumed that petitioner for the purposes of obtaining anticipatory bail had concealed his antecedent before this Court, in that event, the present provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but if on verification, it is found that petitioner has antecedent of three cases, in that event, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

¶24

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶25

vikash/-

¶26

U T

Sonu Mallik @ Sonu Malik v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sonu Mallik @ Sonu Malik v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Balraj Singh @ Bhuntun Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Yadav @ Pramod Jadhav Vs The State of Bihar

Bimla Devi Vs the State of Bihar and Another

Mithu Sahni @ Mithu kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Yadav Vs The State of Bihar