Dismissed¶22

Lotha @ Vir Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC28 Apr 2026CR. MISC./15512/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; Criminal Miscellaneous No.15512 of 2026; anticipatory bail refused; Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 74, 78, 3(5); Alamganj P.S. Case No. 795 of 2025; informant Madhubala Singh; molestation, assault, gold chain snatching; seven criminal antecedents; Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh; decision dated 28-04-2026.

What did the court decide?

Considering the nature of accusation and the petitioner's criminal antecedents, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is refused. ¶22

Lotha @ Vir Prasad Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15512 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-795 Year-2025 Thana- ALAMGANJ District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Lotha @ Vir Prasad Son of Late Bocha Beldar Resident of Village - Beldar Toli Near Pitambara Mandir, Police Station - Alamganj, District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jay Ram Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 28-04-2026

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

¶14

Petitioner apprehends arrest in Alamganj P. S. Case

¶15

No. 795 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 74, 78, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

¶16

As per FIR, the informant namely, Madhubala Singh alleges that on 25.07.2025, accused harassed and molested the informant. It is further alleged that the petitioner along with accused persons assaulted informant’s brother and her son. They also snatched informant’s brother’s gold chain.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. The allegation of assault against the petitioner is general and omnibus. The injury sustained by the injured, is simple in

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15512 of 2026(2) dt.28-04-2026 2/2

¶19

nature and there is delay of two days in lodging the F.I.R.

¶20