Allowed¶19

Md. Taukir v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC27 Apr 2026CR. MISC./13329/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail; Patna High Court; Criminal Miscellaneous No.13329 of 2026; Md. Taukir; The State of Bihar; Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 244 of 2025; Samastipur; Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 351(2), 109, 3(5) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita; Section 482(2) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023; bail bond Rs. 10,000 with two sureties; Chief Judicial Magistrate Samastipur; clean antecedent; no specific overt act; decided 27-04-2026 by Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted: petitioner, on arrest/surrender before the court below within eight weeks, to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Md. Taukir Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶19

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioner, who apprehends arrest in Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 244 of 2025 for offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 351(2), 109, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, is entitled to anticipatory bail.

¶13

Ratio / Principle

Anticipatory bail is allowed in favour of the petitioner, the court being guided by the backdrop of the case, the nature of the accusation and the petitioner's clean antecedent.

¶19

Key takeaways

In the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within eight weeks, the petitioner is to be enlarged on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.ratio¶19

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Anticipatory bail allowed — Petitioner apprehending arrest in Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 244 of 2025 (Thana Kalyanpur, District Samastipur) for offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 351(2), 109, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita; as per F.I.R. he allegedly damaged water bottles worth Rs. 8,000/- of the informant's shop, the allegation of assault being against other accused persons with no specific overt act against him, and he claimed clean antecedent. Considering the backdrop of the case, nature of accusation and clean antecedent, the court allowed anticipatory bail: on arrest/surrender before the court below within eight weeks, petitioner to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13329 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-244 Year-2025 Thana- KALYANPUR District- Samastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Taukir Son of Jasmin @ Md. Jasim @ Jasim Resident of Village -Parushottampur PO -Kalyanpur PS -Kalyanpur District -Samastipur

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 27-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

¶13

Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 351(2), 109, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

¶14

As per F.I.R., this petitioner damaged water bottles worth Rs. 8,000/- of the shop of informant.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Allegation of assault is against other accused persons and there is no allegation of any specific overt act against petitioner. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

¶16

Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶17

Considering backdrop of the case, nature of

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13329 of 2026(2) dt.27-04-2026 2/2

¶19

accusation and clean antecedent, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bailbond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in connection with Kalyanpur P. S. Case No. 244 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

¶20

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶21

Navya/-

¶22

U T

Md. Taukir v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Taukir v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shivjee Nath Chauhan @ Shivjee Nath Chaudhari Vs The State of Bihar

Raj Kamal Gupta Vs The State of Bihar

Dilkhush Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Satendra Yadav @ Suga Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Imam Ali @ Samsir Vs The State of Bihar

Bikash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar