Muskan Alam @ Muskan Mudsbin @ Muskan Mudassir v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC10 Apr 2026CR. MISC./15291/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail; second/renewed bail application after prior rejection; prolonged judicial custody since 24.03.2025; no criminal antecedent; punitive pretrial incarceration; Article 21 of the Constitution; Sections 302, 304(B), 34 IPC; Madhuban PS Case No. 260 of 2024; East Champaran at Motihari; charge framed 02.04.2026; eight charge-sheeted witnesses none examined; trial to conclude within nine months; bail bonds Rs. 15,000 with two like sureties; Patna High Court Criminal Miscellaneous No.15291 of 2026; Rudra Prakash Mishra J.

What did the court decide?

Release on regular bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below/concerned Court, in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 260 of 2024. ¶¶20

Muskan Alam @ Muskan Mudsbin @ Muskan Mudassir Vs… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15291 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-260 Year-2024 Thana- MADHUBAN District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Muskan Alam @ Muskan Mudsbin @ Muskan Mudassir Son of Late Mahhoom Jillani @ Late Marhoom Jillani Resident of Village- Khairava, P.S.- Madhuban, District- East Champaran at Motihari

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Karandeep Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶8

ORAL ORDER

¶9

3 10-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶10

APP for the State.

¶11

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 260 of 2024, instituted for the offences under Sections 302, 304(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

This is the second attempt of the petitioner for bail. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for grant of regular bail which was earlier rejected by this Court vide order dated 14.07.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 35193 of 2025 taking into consideration the fact that postmortem report corroborates the allegation levelled in the FIR.

¶13

In compliance of the order dated 11.03.2026, a report dated 04.04.2026 with regard to the present stage of trial has been received. From perusal of the aforesaid report, it

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15291 of 2026(3) dt.10-04-2026 2/3

¶15

appears that charge has been framed against the petitioner on 02.04.2026 and no any witness has been examined in this case out of eight charge-sheeted witnesses. It is further reported that the trial is likely to be concluded within a period of nine months.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 24.03.2025 without any rhymes or reason and has got no criminal antecedent. Learned counsel for the petitioner next submits that the continued incarceration of the petitioner without conclusion of trial amounts to a gross violation of the fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, which reiterated by Hon’ble Apex Court in plethora of Judgments.

¶17

Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶18

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the period of custody undergone by the petitioner and taking into account the fact that continued detention of the petitioner would serve no purpose other than punitive pretrial incarceration, which is antithetical to the spirit of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15291 of 2026(3) dt.10-04-2026 3/3

¶20

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 260 of 2024.

¶21

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶22

Rajorshi/-

¶23

U T

Muskan Alam @ Muskan Mudsbin @ Muskan Mudassir v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Muskan Alam @ Muskan Mudsbin @ Muskan Mudassir v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bindeshwari Rai Vs Bebi Devi

Rohit Kumar Singh @ Pramod Kumar Vs Sanjay Singh

Tara Singh Vs Amarnath Ray

Anikel Mishra @ Aniket Mishra Vs the State of Bihar

Krishan Kumar Thakur @ Krishna Kumar Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Tej Bahadur @ Tejbahadur Vs The State of Bihar