Disposed¶18

Rohit Kumar Singh @ Pramod Kumar v. Sanjay Singh

Patna HC8 Apr 2026FA/142/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Conversion of First Appeal into Miscellaneous Appeal; Section 96 CPC; Section 299 Indian Succession Act; ex-parte order dated 26.08.2019 by Additional District Judge-III, Gaya in Probate Case No. 46 of 2019 / 10 of 2015; order dated 19.02.2024 in F.A. No. 39 of 2022; Patna High Court; Rudra Prakash Mishra, J.; decision date 08-04-2026; appellants Rohit Kumar Singh @ Pramod Kumar, Haridwar Singh, Binay Kumar Singh, Vinod Kumar; respondent Sanjay Singh; counsel for appellants Ranjeet Tiwary.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the appellants to convert the First Appeal into a Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act within four weeks. ¶18

Rohit Kumar Singh @ Pramod Kumar Vs Sanjay Singh — Succession and Inheritance | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA FIRST APPEAL No.142 of 2024

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Rohit Kumar Singh @ Pramod Kumar Son of Late Saheb Singh, Resident of village - Surhari, P.O. - Bhadeja, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Gaya, Bihar.

¶4

Haridwar Singh, Son of Late Chandrika Singh, Resident of village - Surhari, P.O. - Bhadeja, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Gaya, Bihar.

¶5

Binay Kumar Singh, Son of Late Saheb Singh, Resident of village - Surhari, P.O. - Bhadeja, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Gaya, Bihar.

¶6

Vinod Kumar, Son of Late Saheb Singh, Resident of village - Surhari, P.O. - Bhadeja, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Gaya, Bihar.

¶7

... ... Appellant/s

¶8

Versus

¶9

Sanjay Singh Son of Laxmi Singh, Resident of village - Surheri, P.O. - Bhadeja, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Gaya, Bihar.

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Ranjeet Tiwary, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 08-04-2026

¶14

Perused the office notes dated 02.12.2024/26.03.2026.

¶15

From perusal of record it appears that the present memo of appeal has been filed u/s 96 of C.P.C. against impugned order dated 26.08.2019 passed by learned Additional District JudgeIII, Gaya in Probate Case No. 46 of 2019 / 10 of 2015, whereby learned Court below has allowed the said case ex-parte. The said case seems to have not contested by Opposite party in view of para No.3 of the impugned order.

¶16

In the light of the order dated 19.02.2024 passed in F.A. No. 39 of 2022, the appellants are directed to convert the

¶17

Patna High Court FA No.142 of 2024(2) dt.08-04-2026 2/2

¶18

present First Appeal into Miscellaneous Appeal u/s 299 of the Indian Succession Act, within a period of four weeks.

¶19

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶20

manish/-

¶21

Rohit Kumar Singh @ Pramod Kumar v. Sanjay Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rohit Kumar Singh @ Pramod Kumar v. Sanjay Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunita Singh Vs Ajay Kumar Singh

Ram Prasad Rai alias Prasad Rai Vs Mahesh Rai

Ranju Devi Vs Sajnai Devi

Tara Singh Vs Amarnath Ray

Bindeshwari Rai Vs Bebi Devi

Anikel Mishra @ Aniket Mishra Vs the State of Bihar