Disposed

Nilambar Yadav @ Lilamber Kumar Yadav @ Lilambar Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Feb 2026CR. MISC./12173/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought anticipatory bail for offences under the BNS including attempted rape and trespass arising from a neighbour dispute over a pathway. The court granted bail on surrender within eight weeks with standard conditions under Section 482 BNSS.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners to be enlarged on bail upon arrest/surrender within eight weeks; bail-bonds Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of like amount.

Nilambar Yadav @ Lilamber Kumar Yadav @ Lilambar Kumar Vs… — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12173 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-377 Year-2024 Thana- BABUBARHI District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

1. Nilambar Yadav @ Lilamber Kumar Yadav @ Lilambar Kumar S/o Ganesh Yadav @ Ramganesh Yadav R/o vill - Aurahi, ward no. 1, P.S.- Bhatchaura, P.s.- Babubarhi, Distt.- Madhubani

¶5

Chandan Yadav @ Chandan Kumar Yadav S/o Ganesh Yadav @ Ram Ganesh Yadav R/o vill - Aurahi, ward no. 1, P.S.- Bhatchaura, P.s.Babubarhi, Distt.- Madhubani

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms.Kumari Pallavi For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Ajeet Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 24-02-2026

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶12

A.P.P. for the State.

¶13

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 329(4), 75, 76, 126, 115(2), 303(2), 351(2), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita.

¶14

As per F.I.R., on 20.08.2024 at about 11:00 PM, these two petitioners climbed the wall and entered the house of informant and thereafter, tried to commit rape with her and when informant protested, these petitioners and other coaccused persons assaulted her. It is further alleged that coaccused Kumari Devi and Sarita Devi snatched Mangalsutra & silver ornaments from the informant.

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12173 of 2026(2) dt.24-02-2026 2/2

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners and informant are close door neighbours and due to dispute over pathway/passage, altercation took place. Injuries, sustained by informant, are simple in nature. Rest of the allegation are ornamental in order to make the case grave. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

¶17

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail

¶18

petition.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1^st Class, Madhubani in connection with Babubarhi P.S. Case No. 377 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

¶20

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶21

anay

¶22

U T

Nilambar Yadav @ Lilamber Kumar Yadav @ Lilambar Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nilambar Yadav @ Lilamber Kumar Yadav @ Lilambar Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arvind Chauhan Vs The State of Bihar

Gauri Shankar Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Imteyazul Ansari @ Gonaur Ansari @ Intajul Ansari @ Gonaur Vs The State of Bihar

Sajjid Raja Vs The State of Bihar

Yogendra Kumar Das Vs The State of Bihar

Nitesh Kumar @ Nitish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar