Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a Gaya excise case alleging false implication on a Chowkidar's disclosure and non-compliance of Section 103 BNSS after recovery of 75 litres of country liquor. The court granted anticipatory bail subject to BNSS Section 482(2) conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11380 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1255 Year-2025 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya
======================================================
Satish Chaudhary @ Satish Kumar Son of Manoj Chaudhary Resident of Village - Bhadeji Tand, P.S. - Mufassil, District - Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Avinash Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pradeep Narain Kumar, A.P.P. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
2 13-02-2026
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP
for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11380 of 2026(2) dt.13-02-2026 2/2
of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, contends that prima-facie no case is made out against the petitioner.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
manish/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner apprehending arrest in an excise case for recovery of 75 litres of country liquor should be granted anticipatory bail.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Satish Chaudhary @ Satish Kumar
The State of Bihar
Rudra Prakash Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
