Allowed

Ram Chandra Shukla v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Jul 2026CR. APP (SJ)/4659/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal under Section 14A(1) SC/ST Act challenging cognizance under Section 3(1)(x) taken on a complaint. The court found no prima facie ingredients of that offence disclosed and held the trial court acted mechanically, set aside the impugned order to that extent.

What did the court decide?

Impugned cognizance order set aside as regards Section 3(1)(x) SC/ST Act; trial court directed to pass fresh cognizance order.

Ram Chandra Shukla Vs The State of Bihar — Caste Atrocities | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.4659 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-6 Year-2022 Thana- MADHUBANI COMPLAINT CASE District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ram Chandra Shukla, S/O Late Bindeshwari Shukla, Resident of villageKaitola,P.S-Madhubani Town, District-Madhubani.

¶5

Navin Kumar Shukla, S/O Ram Chandra Shukla, Resident of villageKaitola,P.S-Madhubani Town, District-Madhubani.

¶6

Kishor Kumar Shukla @ Nanki Shukla, S/O Ram Chandra Shukla, Resident of village- Kaitola,P.S-Madhubani Town, District-Madhubani.

¶7

Puja Shukla, W/O Navin Shukla @ Navin Kumar Shukla, Resident of village- Kaitola,P.S-Madhubani Town, District-Madhubani.

¶8

Ganesh Mandal, S/O Late Satyadev Mandal, Resident of villageKaitola,P.S-Madhubani Town, District-Madhubani.

¶9

Punam Kumari @ Punam Kumari Mandal, W/O Ganehs Mandal, Resident of village- Kaitola,P.S-Madhubani Town, District-Madhubani.

¶10

Suresh Kumar Mandal, S/O Late Satyadev Mandal, Resident of villageKaitola,P.S-Madhubani Town, District-Madhubani.

¶11

... ... Appellant/s

¶12

Versus

¶13

The State of Bihar

¶14

Arti Devi, W/O Manoj Paswan, R/O Village- Resident of Village- Kaitola, P.S- Madhubani Town, Distt.- Madhubani.

¶15

... ... Respondent/s

¶16

====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Prabhakar Thakur For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sadanand Paswan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶17

10 16-07-2026 Heard the parties.

¶18

2. This appeal has been preferred under Section

¶19

14A(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes

¶20

(Prevention of Atrocities) Act (hereinafter referred to as the "SC/ST Act") by the appellants, seeking quashing of the order dated 26.06.2024 passed by the learned Additional Sessions

¶21

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4659 of 2024(10) dt.16-07-2026 2/4

¶22

Judge-I-cum-Special Judge, Madhubani, in T.R. No. 1507 of 2024, arising out of Complaint Case No. 06 of 2022, whereby and whereunder cognizance of the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 354, 435, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as the "IPC") and Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Act has been taken against the appellants.

¶23

3. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that the impugned order is wholly unsustainable in the eye of law insofar as the offence under Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Act is concerned, as there is no allegation that the appellants corrupted or fouled the water of any spring, reservoir, or any other source used by the complainant or her family members so as to render it less fit for the purpose for which it was being used. It is further submitted that the allegations levelled by the complainant are entirely different and to this extent, the approach adopted by the trial court is legally and factually erroneous. Learned counsel further submits that, so far as the merits of the other allegations are concerned, there are several circumstances indicating the malafide intention of Respondent No. 2/the complainant in instituting the complaint. Firstly, the alleged occurrence is stated to have taken place on 26.12.2021, whereas the complaint was filed by O.P. No. 2 only

¶24

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4659 of 2024(10) dt.16-07-2026 3/4

¶25

on 13.01.2022, without any explanation for the delay. Secondly, there had been a dispute between one Mahant and the complainant's family for the past several years, and only after the death of the said Mahant the complainant choose to file the present complaint, which was subsequently entertained by the trial court. Thirdly, the complainant changed her version while making her statement on solemn affirmation before the trial court. Fourthly, she did not disclose the names of the villagers to whom she allegedly narrated the occurrence on the very next day after the incident.

¶26

4. While opposing this appeal, the learned APP fairly submits that the impugned order is mechanical to the extent of cognizance under Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Act and the same appears to be a bonafide mistake on the part of the trial court.

¶27

5. Considering the above submissions and taking note of the fact that the allegations detailed in the complaint do not even prima facie disclose the commission of the offence under Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Act, this Court finds that the approach adopted by the trial court while taking cognizance, to the extent of said offence under SC/ST Act is not correct. It appears that the trial court passed the impugned order

¶28

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4659 of 2024(10) dt.16-07-2026 4/4

¶29

mechanically, without applying a judicial mind. Hence, the impugned order is hereby set aside, without making any observation with regard to the other allegations, the trial court is directed to pass a fresh order on the point of cognizance in Complaint Case No. 06 of 2022.

¶30

6. In the result, the instant appeal stands allowed.

¶31

(Shailendra Singh, J)

¶32

Rajiv/-

¶33

U T

Ram Chandra Shukla v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Chandra Shukla v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Sabir Vs The State of Bihar

Jitendra Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Sudama Chaudhary @ Sudama Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Devendra Kumar Singh @ Devendra Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Kailash Das Vs The State of Bihar

Akshay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar