Review of a writ order directing recovery of only one-third of excess pension paid by the Bank due to its own error. The petitioner had undertaken not to resist that recovery but filed this review. The court found it ill-advised and dismissed it without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL REVIEW No.48 of 2021
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6865 of 2020
======================================================
Md. Aslam Son of Late Md. Akhtar, Resident of House No. 72, Near-Pond, Bishanpur, Hakimabad, P.S.-Mofassil, P.O.-Bishanpur and DistrictSamastipur.
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mohammed Abu Haidar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Rai, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
following relief(s):
“for reviewing the order/judgment dated
23.12.2020 passed by HMJ Chakradhari Sharan Singh (as his lordship then was) in CWJC No. 6865 of 2020.”
Patna High Court C. REV. No.48 of 2021(3) dt.03-07-2025 2/3
challenging the direction given by the respondent by which taking note of the fact that the petitioner, a Railway employee was entitled to Rs. 14,936/- as pension amount instead of Rs. 30,874/-, direction was given for returning the extra amount.
Patna High Court C. REV. No.48 of 2021(3) dt.03-07-2025 3/3
what was recorded by the writ Court. Certainly, it is an ill advised petition and the Court wanted to dismiss it with cost. However, taking note of the fact that the petitioner is a retired personnel and the matter relates to pension amount, it refrains from doing so.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Adnan/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ court's direction limiting recovery of excess pension to one-third of the amount paid in error warranted review.
Md. Aslam
Bank of India
The Manager, Bank of India Centralized Pension Proceeding Centre, Nagpur
Branch Manager, Bank of India, Samastipur
Zonal Railway Manager (Appointment), East Central Railway, Samastipur
Financial Advisor and Chief Account Officer, East Central Railway, Hajipur
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
