Petitioners withdrew this contempt petition upon the respondent State confirming an earlier order addressing the grievance. The court disposed of the matter allowing the withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.995 of 2025
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17644 of 2023
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Kaushik, Advocate. Ms.Namrata Dubey, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kinkar Kumar, SC-9. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 10-10-2025 At the outset, Mr. Kinkar Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State informs that after considering the grievance of the petitioners, order has been passed contained in Memo No. 816 dated 10.02.2025.
Patna High Court MJC No.995 of 2025(2) dt.10-10-2025 2/2
of the State, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks to withdraw the present contempt petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law.
of.
(Purnendu Singh, J)
mantreshwar/-
U
Sumit Kumar Singh and Others
The State of Bihar
Purnendu Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
