Petitioners sought withdrawal of their criminal miscellaneous petition; counsel requested permission to withdraw, and the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15646 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-225 Year-2019 Thana- AURANGABAD COMPLAINT CASE District- Aurangabad
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vaibhav Kumar Jha, Advocate Mr.Aman Vishal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Satyendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER
3 10-10-2025 Mr. Vaibhav Kumar Jha (Enrollment No. No.BR/1137/2018, Mobile No.930457830), on the instruction of Mr. Aman Vishal, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks to withdraw the present petition.
(Purnendu Singh, J)
Sanjay/- U T
Chalitar Yadav @ Ramcharitra Yadav
Ramshray Yadav
Ramahish Yadav
Vishwanath Yadav
Mutur Yadav
The State of Bihar
Purnendu Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
