Contempt petition arising from a writ petition. Counsel for the petitioner stated the writ order had been complied with; the court closed and disposed of the contempt petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1406 of 2019 In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9079 of 2017
======================================================
Mahesh Yadav S/o Late Prayag Yadav Resident of Village-Chhipalia, Police Station-Bahadurpur, District-Darbhanga, at present R/o 107 Law College Professor Colony, P.S. Mahendru, District-Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate Mr. Jay Prakash Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prabhat Ranjan Singh, AC to AAG-15 For Patna University : Mr. Md. Nadim Seraj, Advocate Mr. Shahbaj Alam, Advocate ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA ORAL ORDER
order passed in the writ petition has been complied with.
and disposed of.
Narendra/-
(Nani Tagia, J)
U
Mahesh Yadav
The State of Bihar
R.K. Mahajan
Dr. (Prof.) Rekha Kumari
The Patna University Patna
Prof. Rasbihari Singh
Nani Tagia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
