Petitioner filed a writ petition. Learned counsel submitted that the sought relief was already granted by respondent authorities. The court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12297 of 2022
======================================================
Punita Kumari W/o Vidya Sagar Ram, R/o Vill Ghataila, P.O. Pachokhar, P.S. Asaon, District- Siwan.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Smt. Shilpa Singh (Ga12) Ms. Namrata Singh, AC to Ex GA- 12
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the relief, sought for by the petitioner in the instant writ petition, has been granted by the respondent authorities.
writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(Nani Tagia, J)
Siddharth Sagar/-
U
Punita Kumari W/o Vidya Sagar Ram
State of Bihar through its Secretary Education Department, Govt. of Bihar
Director (Primary Education) Education Department, Govt. of Bihar
District Magistrate, Siwan
District Education Officer, Siwan
District Programme Officer (Establishment), Siwan
Nani Tagia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
