First appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as no one appeared for the appellants despite repeated absences noted across multiple coordinate Benches.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA FIRST APPEAL No.726 of 1977
======================================================
Harendra Kishore Singh and Ors.
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
Deorano Kuer and Ors.
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prem Kumar Verma, Advocate : Mr. Binay Kant Mani Tripathi, Advocate : Ms. Ajita, Advocate : Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha, Advocate ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
88 09-12-2025
No one appears on behalf of the appellant though
other side is present.
order no.80 dated 16.12.2021, absence of appellant’s counsel was recorded.
Patna High Court FA No.726 of 1977(88) dt.09-12-2025 2/2
behalf of the appellant.
prosecution.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
vinayak/-
U
Harendra Kishore Singh
Deorano Kuer
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
