Dismissed¶30

Garbhu Das v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC17 Jun 2025CWJC/9124/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court CWJC No.9124 of 2017, Garbhu Das v. State of Bihar - mandamus for land demarcation (plot no.513, Khata no.198, area 8 katha, village Gangdah, PS Baheri, Darbhanga); Amin fee Rs.732/- deposited 13.6.2015; counter-affidavit of respondents 3-6 stating demarcation completed; private respondents 8-9 (Brajesh Yadav, Mithilesh Yadav) possession dispute; dismissed for non-prosecution; Rajiv Roy, J.; 17-06-2025.

What did the court decide?

As no one appeared for the petitioner though the State was present, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. ¶30

Garbhu Das Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9124 of 2017

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Garbhu Das son of Kalpu Das, resident of Village- Gangdah, Police StationBaheri, District- Darbhanga.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Bihar and Ors

¶7

The Commissioner Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga.

¶8

The District Magistrate, District- Darbhanga.

¶9

The Sub- Divisional Officer, Sadar Benipur, District- Darbhanga.

¶10

The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Benipur, District- Darbhanga.

¶11

The Circle Officer, Baheri, District- Darbhanga.

¶12

The Anchal Amin, Circle Office, Baheri, District- Darbhanga.

¶13

Brajesh Yadav.

¶14

Mithilesh Yadav. Both Sons of Dhyani Yadav. Both resident of VillageGangdah, Police Station- Baheri, District- Darbhanga.

¶15

... ... Respondent/s

¶16

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Dhurjati Kumar Prasad, GP-14 ======================================================

¶17

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

¶18

ORAL ORDER

¶19

3 17-06-2025

¶20

No one appears on behalf of the petitioner though the

¶21

State is present.

¶22

The present writ petition has been preferred for the

¶23

following relief(s):

¶24

“I. For issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding to the respondent Circle Officer, Baheri, DistrictDarbhanga to make demarcation of plot no.513, Khata no.198 area 8 katha situated in village Gangdah, Police Station-Baheri, DistrictDarbhanga, for that the petitioner has already

¶25

Patna High Court CWJC No.9124 of 2017(3) dt.17-06-2025 2/2

¶26

deposited Rs.732/- as Amin fee in the Nazarat of Circle Office on 13.6.2015 but till date the demarcation has not been made by the Circle Amin and report has not been sent to the Circle Officer.

¶27

II. For issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding to the respondent nos. 8 and 9 to not disturb the petitioner from the peaceful possession over the aforesaid land.

¶28

III. To pass such other order or order’s as may deem fit and proper.”

¶29

Learned counsel for the State at the outset submits that the demarcation has already been done and the same has been put on record by way of paragraph-8 of the counteraffidavit filed on behalf of the respondent nos. 3 to 6 and there is no reply to the said counter-affidavit also.

¶30

Be that as it may, since there is no appearance, the same is dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶31

(Rajiv Roy, J)

¶32

Adnan/-

¶33

Garbhu Das v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Garbhu Das v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satyam Kumar @ Shashi Ranjan@ Shashi Rajan Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Kapildeo Ram @ Dularchand Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Arbind Kumar Poddar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kaum Mian @ Qayyum Ali Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Singheshwar Gorhi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.