Dismissed¶23

Singheshwar Gorhi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC17 Jun 2025CWJC/2256/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; CWJC No.2256 of 2017; Rajiv Roy, J.; 17-06-2025; Khatiyan correction; writ of Mandamus; Bihar revenue records; Khata No. 266 old / 841 new; Khesra No. 1297 old / 1910 new; Thana No. 149; Tauzi No. 3306; Mauza Puraini Bansgopal; P.S. Puraini; District Madhepura; 42 decimals; Khatiyani land; petitioner deceased; dismissal for non-prosecution; liberty to heirs; no appearance; State of Bihar; Dhurjati Kumar Prasad GP-14.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; liberty granted to the heirs of the deceased petitioner to agitate the matter afresh if they so wish. ¶23

Singheshwar Gorhi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2256 of 2017

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Singheshwar Gorhi son of Late Narayan Gorhi, resident of Village- Puraini, P.S.- Puraini, Distt- Madhepura, Presently residing at Village- Falka, P.S.Falka, Distt- Katihar.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Bihar

¶7

The Sub Divisional Officer, Madhepura.

¶8

The Deputy Collector of Land Reforms, Puraini.

¶9

The Superintendent of Police, Madhepura.

¶10

The Officer Incharge, P.S.- Puraini, District- Madhepura.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Dhurjati Kumar Prasad, GP-14 ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

¶13

ORAL ORDER

¶14

5 17-06-2025

¶15

No one appears on behalf of the petitioner though the State is present.

¶16

The present petition has been preferred for the following relief:

¶17

“for issuance of a writ in the nature of 'Mandamus' commanding and directing the state respondents to make a correction in the Khatiyan having lands appertaining to Khata No. 266(old) Khata no. 841 (new) corresponding to Khesra No.1297 (old) Khesra No. 1910(new) Thana No.149 Tauzi No. 3306 falling within Mauza

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.2256 of 2017(5) dt.17-06-2025 2/2

¶19

Puraini Bansgopal P.S- Puraini, DistrictMadhepura, measuring an area 42 decimals of lands, which has been wrongly entered in the revenue records of the state of Bihar, although the aforesaid land is admittedly the Khatiyani lands of the petitioner.”

¶20

A perusal of the order no. 2 dated 29.10.2024 would show that the petitioner is no more and prayer for adjournment was made to file an appropriate petition.

¶21

On 20.01.2025 and 18.03.2025, the same prayers were made.

¶22

Today on call, there is no appearance neither any petition is on record.

¶23

Granting liberty to the heirs to agitate the matter if he/she/they so wants as also the fact that the sole petitioner is no more, the petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶24

(Rajiv Roy, J)

¶25

Adnan/-

¶26

Singheshwar Gorhi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Singheshwar Gorhi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satyam Kumar @ Shashi Ranjan@ Shashi Rajan Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Kapildeo Ram @ Dularchand Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Arbind Kumar Poddar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kaum Mian @ Qayyum Ali Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Garbhu Das Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.