Disposed¶26

Sahil Singh @ Raj Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Jan 2025CWJC/690/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court CWJC 690/2025 (decided 21 January 2025, Rajesh Kumar Verma, J.): writ application disposed of by directing the District Magistrate, Buxar to decide the petitioner's pending representation dated 05.12.2024 within six weeks in accordance with law.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No. 4 (District Magistrate, Buxar) to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 05.12.2024 in accordance with law within six weeks from receipt/production of a copy of the order. ¶26

Sahil Singh @ Raj Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.690 of 2025

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Sahil Singh @ Raj Kumar Singh S/o Dhirendra Singh, Resident of VillageKathar, P.O.- Kathar, P.S.- Krishnabrahma, District- Buxar.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Patna, Bihar.

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, Patna, Bihar.

¶8

The Principal Secretary, Department of Panchyati Raj, Patna, Bihar.

¶9

The District Magistrate, Buxar.

¶10

The District Development Commissioner, Buxar.

¶11

The Monitoring Officer, Department of Panchyati Raj, Patna, Bihar.

¶12

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Dumaron, Buxar.

¶13

The Circle Officer, Brahmpur, Buxar.

¶14

... ... Respondent/s

¶15

======================================================

¶16

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajiv Ranjan Kr. Pandey, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Dhurendra Kumar, A.C. to G.P.-5 ======================================================

¶17

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶18

2 21-01-2025

¶19

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶20

counsel for the State.

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the representation of the petitioner dated 05.12.2024 (Annexure-P/5 Series) is still pending before the respondent authorities and they have not disposed of the representation of the petitioner as yet. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that this writ application may be disposed of with direction to the concerned authority.

¶22

Accordingly, respondent No.4, (District Magistrate,

¶23

Patna High Court CWJC No.690 of 2025(2) dt.21-01-2025 2/2

¶24

Buxar) is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 05.12.2024 and dispose of the same in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶25

With the aforesaid direction, this writ application

¶26

stands disposed of.

¶27

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

¶28

Nitesh/-

¶29

Sahil Singh @ Raj Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sahil Singh @ Raj Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parmeshwar Rao Vs The State of Bihar

Rohit Kumar @ Rai Rohit Sharma, Vs The State of Bihar

Mritunjay Mishra Vs The State of Bihar

Kumar Anjani Shahi @ Anjani Shahi Vs The State of Bihar

Sadhvi Vijay Laxmi @ Sadavi Vijay Laxmi Vs The State of Bihar

Kedar Sharma Vs The State of Bihar