Disposed¶27

Pramod Kumar v. The State of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC24 Mar 2025CWJC/2707/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Considering the submissions advanced, the averments made in the counter affidavit and the nature of relief, the writ petition stands closed. ¶27

Pramod Kumar Vs The State of Bihar and Ors. — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2707 of 2019

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Pramod Kumar S/o Late Bujhawan Thakur, Resident of Village- Madhaul, P.O.-Susta Madhopur, P.S.-Kudhani (O.P.-Turki), District- Muzaffarpur

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

¶7

The Principal Secretary General Administration Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

¶8

The Commissioner Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur

¶9

The District Magistrate Muzaffarpur

¶10

The Principal Secretary Revenue and Land Reform Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

¶11

The Assistant Director Sub-Regional Employment Exchange, Muzaffarpur

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Diwakar Prasad Karn, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sheo Shankar Prasad (SC-8)

¶14

======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶16

3 24-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶17

The petitioner has approached this Court, seeking a direction upon the respondent-authorities to appoint him on Class-IV post in pursuance to advertisement published by respondent-District Magistrate by taking into consideration that the petitioner was a retrenched employee of 1991 census.

¶18

To support the claim as prayed for in the present writ petition, it is contended that the Government has taken a policy decision and resolved that in case of available vacancies, the retrenched census employees shall be considered by granting

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.2707 of 2019(3) dt.24-03-2025 2/3

¶20

them one time age relaxation subject to fulfillment of further criteria.

¶21

A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of Respondent Nos. 4 and 6.

¶22

Learned Advocate for the State referring to the counter affidavit has contended that in due process, a final panel was prepared and published in the year 2011, out of which eligible candidates were selected and appointed against vacancies according to the roster. Though the panel is valid only for one year, but in compliance with the order of this Court passed in different matters, a meeting of District Level Selection Committee was held on 13.02.2017 for appointment on the post of Group D for different financial years. A time bound action plan was made and published on notice board for claim and objection, if any. It is the specific contention of the respondentauthorities that the petitioner did not turn up to file claim/objection, as such the revised panel was published on 06.03.2017.

¶23