Disposed

Fair Price Dealers Association, v. The union of India

Patna HC7 Apr 2025CWJC/2583/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought redress of a grievance concerning E-POS machine operations. Without entering merits, the court directed Respondent No. 2 to consider their pending representation and either make necessary changes or pass a reasoned rejection, within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Respondent No. 2 to consider the representation and act or pass a reasoned order within six weeks.

Fair Price Dealers Association, Vs The union of… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2583 of 2025

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Fair Price Dealers Association, Registered Office Bhikna Pahari, Patna 4 and Head Office Hasanpura Beur Patna 2 through its District Secretary, Man Mohan Prasad, Gender Male Aged about 61 years, S/O Janardan Prasad Resident of Village- Kalyanpur, P.S Jamui, District - Jamui (Bihar).

¶4

Shankar Prasad Sah Son of Ram Lakhan Sah Resident of Village- West Azimganj, P.S Kharagpur, District Munger (Bihar)

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

1. The union of India through the Ministry of consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, Department of Food and Public Distribution, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi

¶8

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Old Secretariat, Patna.

¶9

The All divisional Commissioner, Bihar

¶10

The All District Magistrate, Bihar.

¶11

The All District Supply Officer, Bihar.

¶12

The All Sub Divisional Officer, Bihar

¶13

The All Block Supply Officer, Bihar.

¶14

... ... Respondent/s

¶15

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Gaurav, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.Additional Solicitor General For the UOI : Mr. Amrendra Nath Verma, Sr. Adv. Mr. Girija Shankar Prasad, Adv. For the State : Mr. Rajesh Roy, Adv. ======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER

¶17

2 07-04-2025 Without going into the merits or demerits of the case, having regard to the fact that the petitioner has already given a representation to the Respondent No. 2 ventilating his grievance (Annexure- 6). The present writ petition is disposed of at the stage of Admission with the consent of both the counsels.

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.2583 of 2025(2) dt.07-04-2025 2/2

¶19

The Respondent No. 2 shall consider the representation given by the petitioner and if the same is found to be correct, make necessary changes in the E-POS machine. In case the authority comes to the conclusion that the representation made by the petitioner does not merit any consideration, he shall pass order giving reasons for the rejection. Any order passed shall be communicated to the party. The entire exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.

¶20

With the above directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

¶21

(A. Abhishek Reddy , J)

¶22

Gauravkr/-

¶23

Fair Price Dealers Association, v. The union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Fair Price Dealers Association, v. The union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anjali Kumari Vs The State of Bihar through Dr. N. Saravana Kumar, the Principal Secretary

Arvind Kumar Vs The State of Bihar through Sri Pratyaya Amrit, the Principal Secretary, Health Department

M/s. Jyoti Moulders Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State of Bihar

Raj Dev Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Bijay Kumar Das Vs The State of Bihar

Kiran Kumari Vs The State of Bihar