Disposed

Raj Dev Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC7 Apr 2025CWJC/2527/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ seeking relief related to an E-POS machine defect. Without going to merits, the High Court disposed of the petition at the admission stage by consent. Directions were issued to the Sub-Divisional Officer to consider the petitioner's representation within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed Respondent No. 8 to consider the petitioner's representation and act accordingly within six weeks, communicating any order made.

Raj Dev Paswan Vs The State of Bihar — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2527 of 2025

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Raj Dev Paswan Son of Anandi Paswan, Resident of Village Kanhauli Bishunpur Parsi, P.S - Mahua, District Vaishali (Bihar).

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Food and Consumer Protection Department, Old Secretariat, Patna.

¶7

The Managing Director, Bihar State Food Corporation, Patna.

¶8

The Head I.T.Cell, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Old Secretariat, Patna.

¶9

The District Magistrate, District - Vaishali.

¶10

The District Supply Officer, District - Vaishali.

¶11

The District Manager, Bihar State Food Corporation, Vaishali.

¶12

The Additional District Manager, Bihar State Food Corporation, District - Vaishali.

¶13

The Sub - Divisional Officer, Mahua, District Vaishali.

¶14

The Assistant District Supply Officer, Mahua, District- Vaishali.

¶15

The Block Supply Officer, Goraul, District- Vaishali.

¶16

The Assistant Godown Manager, Goraul, District Vaishali.

¶17

... ... Respondent/s

¶18

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Gaurav, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Standing Counsel (21) For the BSFC : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Singh, Adv. Mr. Utkarsha Utpal, Adv. Ms. Shilpi Singh, Adv. For the State : Mr. Rakesh Prabhat, Adv. ======================================================

¶19

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER

¶20

2 07-04-2025 Without going into the merits or demerits of the case,

¶21

having regard to the fact that the petitioner has already given a representation to the Respondent No. 8 ventilating his grievance (Annexure- P/7). The present writ petition is disposed of at the stage of Admission with the consent of both the counsels.

¶22

Patna High Court CWJC No.2527 of 2025(2) dt.07-04-2025 2/2

¶23

The Respondent No. 8 shall consider the representation given by the petitioner and if the same is found to be correct, make necessary changes in the E-POS machine. In case the authority comes to the conclusion that the representation made by the petitioner does not merit any consideration, he shall pass order giving reasons for the rejection. Any order passed shall be communicated to the party. The entire exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.

¶24

With the above directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

¶25

(A. Abhishek Reddy , J)

¶26

Gauravkr/-

¶27

Raj Dev Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raj Dev Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anjali Kumari Vs The State of Bihar through Dr. N. Saravana Kumar, the Principal Secretary

Arvind Kumar Vs The State of Bihar through Sri Pratyaya Amrit, the Principal Secretary, Health Department

M/s. Jyoti Moulders Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State of Bihar

Fair Price Dealers Association, Vs The union of India

Bijay Kumar Das Vs The State of Bihar

Kiran Kumari Vs The State of Bihar