Dr. Shiv Bachchan Pandey Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bijay Kumar Pandey, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anant Pd. Singh, SC15 Mrs. Deepika Sharma, AC to SC15 ======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER

¶15

2 07-07-2025

¶16

Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner and

¶17

Learned Counsel for the State.

¶18

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition has been filed with the following reliefs:-

¶19

I. That, this is an application is for issuance of an appropriate, writ(s), direction(s) or order commanding and directing the respondents to grant benefit of A.C.P. (Notional) to the petitioner with interest with effect from 1.8.2003, who after completion of 12 years of service on same post and Pay scale as Lecturer (Non Medical) in Health Education & Family Welfare

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.25049 of 2013(2) dt.07-07-2025 2/3

¶21

and superannuated on 31.7.2004 as health Education officer, State Family Welfare Bureau, Bihar, Patna after closure of Post Partum Programme Scheme in same Pay scale.

¶22

During service period and even after superannuation the petitioner made many representations to pay the same then at last in 2009 i.e. on 1.4.2009 the respondent Joint Director health Services- cum-Public Information officer in its Memo No.135(12) had directed the petitioner to make available certain relevant documents and in compliance the petitioner has submitted all the required documents soon but till date the respondents has pay no heed as such the petitioner is not getting the benefit of A.C.P. though he worked for more than 12 years on same pay scale.

¶23

Counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner has completed 12 years of his work, but A.C.P. has not been granted to him only on the ground that he has not passed the examination of accounts. He further submits that the issue involved in the present writ petition has already been decided by the Hon’ble Full Bench of this Court in case of Kamlanand Thakur Vs. State of Bihar passed in C.W.J.C. No.18727 of 2017.

¶24

Counsel for the State submits that it is true that Hon’ble Full Bench of this Court has decided this matter on 28^th

¶25

Patna High Court CWJC No.25049 of 2013(2) dt.07-07-2025 3/3

¶26

June, 2024.

¶27

In the light of the submissions made, the present writ petition is hereby disposed off directing the petitioner to file a fresh representation along with the decision made by Hon’ble Full Bench of this Court in case of Kamlanand Thakur Vs. State of Bihar passed in C.W.J.C. No.18727 of 2017 before the Director-in-Chief Health Services, Bihar, Patna (respondent No.2) within 30 days along with this order and respondent No.2 shall pass a reasoned and speaking order within 90 days after receiving the same thereafter.

¶28

It is made clear that the order impugned shall not be barrier for the respondent No.2 in deciding the matter of the petitioner.

¶29

With the aforesaid directions and observations, the present writ application stands disposed off.

¶30

(Dr. Anshuman, J.)

¶31

Prakashmani/-

¶32

U

Dr. Shiv Bachchan Pandey v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Shiv Bachchan Pandey v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandani Devi @ Chanda Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Sonail Kumar Chaudhary @ Sanchil Chaudhary @ Sanehil Chaudhary @ Sanail Kumar Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Parshuram Sahani @ Parshuran Sahni Vs The State of Bihar

Radhe Shyam Puranmalka Vs The State of Bihar

Shiv Nandan Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Devmuni Sah Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.