Nawal Bind Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gautam Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Nutan Sahay, AC to AAG-12 ======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

¶17

ORAL ORDER

¶18

2 05-08-2025 Heard the parties.

¶19

The present petition has been preferred for the

¶20

following relief(s):

¶21

“(a) A writ in the nature of mandamus be

¶22

issued against the respondent to issue Shikmahi Paswan (Patta) in favour of petitioner who is member cum group leader of Nimi Jalkar under Daniyawan Prakhand Sahyog Samitee Ltd. Daniyawan Patna.

¶23

(b) To direct the respondent to give effect of Letter No. issued under 730 dated 15.09.2016

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.17396 of 2016(2) dt.05-08-2025 2/3

¶25

District signature of Fishery Officer, Cum Chief Executive Officer, Patna by which Respondent No. 5 has been directed to issue Patta in favour of after petitioner taking revenue from him with immediate effect.

¶26

(c) To No. direct the Respondent implement the Letter No. 4 to 730 dated 15.09.16 by which he has been requested, accept the petitioner who is original Pattedar, other may not be allowed for Shikarmahi of the pond.

¶27

(d) To direct the respondent no 5 to take the revenue and from the petitioner issue Shikarmahi Patta in faovur of the petitioner as well as the member of Nimi Jalkar in pursuant of Letter No. 730 dated 15.09.11 issued by Respondent No. 3.

¶28

(e) During the pendency of the writ petition stay the Shikarmahi of pond of Nimi Jalakar under Daniyawan Prakhand Matsyajeevi Sahyog Samittee Ltd. Patna.

¶29

(f) Any other relief/s for which the petitioner is entitled under the facts and circumstances of case.”

¶30

The counter-affidavit of respondent nos. 1 to 3 duly

¶31

Patna High Court CWJC No.17396 of 2016(2) dt.05-08-2025 3/3

¶32

signed by the District Fishery Officer, Patna is on record after service of copy to the learned counsel for the petitioner in the year 2018 and according to paragraph 5, the petitioner has suppressed the material facts that after the order passed on 15.09.2016 (Annexure-4 to the petition), the respondent no. 5 filed representation before the Chief Secretary Cell, Bihar, forwarded to the Director, Fisheries Department, Bihar where they all were heard on 26.09.2016 and thereafter vide an order dated 04.10.2016, it came to the conclusion that recourse is to approach the Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Bihar, Patna. She submits that even otherwise, the writ petition has become infructuous.

¶33

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that they shall be pursuing the matter before an appropriate authority.

¶34

Without commenting on the merit of the case and granting said liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶35

(Rajiv Roy, J)

¶36

Adnan/-

¶37

U

Nawal Bind v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nawal Bind v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amrawati Devi Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Yogendra Prasad Bhakta Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Pankaj Kumar Singh and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Md. Islam Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ramesh Kumar Singh @ Ramesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ajay Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.