Writ petition challenging two mutation revision orders of the Additional Collector, Nawadah, alleged to have been passed without hearing the petitioner. Counsel sought only liberty to pursue an alternate remedy; the court granted the liberty and disposed of the petition without deciding any issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15399 of 2017
======================================================
Rajendra Singh Son of late Ambika Singh Resident of VillageKena, P.S. Muffassil, District Nawadah.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hansraj, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha -SC-19
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
following relief(s):
“for quashing the order dated
15.07.2009 as well as the order dated 31.05.2007 whereby and whereunder the learned Additional Collector, Nawadah has allowed the Mutation Revision petition without hearing the petitioner (opposite party).”
Patna High Court CWJC No.15399 of 2017(4) dt.05-05-2025 2/2
will suffice that if the petitioner is granted liberty to explore an
alternate remedy.
of.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Adnan/-
U
Rajendra Singh
The State Of Bihar
The District Magistrate, Nawadah
The Additional Collector, Nawadah
The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Nawadah
The Circle Officer, Nawadah, District- Nawadah
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
