Disposed¶20

Kalawati Devi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC21 Jul 2025CWJC/14787/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of as the grievance of the petitioner was already settled; personal appearance of the Municipal Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Chapra, dispensed with. ¶20

Kalawati Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14787 of 2013

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Kalawati Devi W/O Bhola Ram Resident Of Mohalla- Chhatradhari Bazar, P.O And P.S- Bhagwan Bazar, District- Chapra.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Urban Development, New Secretariat, Patna.

¶7

The District Magistrate, Saran At Chapra. 3. The Chairman, Nagar Parishad, Chapra.

¶8

The Executive Officer, Nagar Parisad, Chapra.

¶9

... ... Respondent/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Dr. Alok Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prashant Pratap, GP-2 For Chapra Nagar Nigam: Mr. Indu Bhushan, Advocate ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER

¶12

9 21-07-2025

¶13

Learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Counsel

¶14

for the Municipal Corporation along with Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, Municipal Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Chapra, and learned Counsel for the State are present.

¶15

Learned Counsel for the Municipal Corporation submits that in compliance of order dated 16.06.2025, Mr. Sunil

¶16

Kumar Pandey, Municipal Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Chapra, is present in the Court and filed his counter affidavit and explained the situation that mistake is not on the part of Municipal Commissioner; rather due to nonappearance of Counsel for the Municipal Corporation on the

¶17

Patna High Court CWJC No.14787 of 2013(9) dt.21-07-2025 2/2

¶18

said date, the said order had been passed. Counsel further submits that the submission of Counsel for the petitioner that no payment has been made is not correct; rather benefits under 5^th Pay Commission from 01.01.1996 to 30.06.2010 and benefit under 6^th Pay Commission from 01.01.2006 onward along with payment of arrears arising out of enhanced salary for the period from 01.01.1996 to 30.06.2010 as well as 1^st ACP and 2^nd ACP have already been paid much earlier.

¶19

Learned Counsel for the State submits that the statement of the Counter affidavit is correct.

¶20

In this view of the matter that grievance of the petitioner has already been settled, the writ petition is disposed off. Personal appearance of Municipal Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Chapra, is hereby dispensed with.

¶21

(Dr. Anshuman, J)

¶22

Mkr./-

¶23

Kalawati Devi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kalawati Devi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Atul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary

Ramesh Mahto @ Ramesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Vs The State of Bihar through The Collector,Patna Collectorate,Patna

Md. Yusuf Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Prakash Yadav and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Jay Nandan Kumar @ Jainandan Kr. Vs The State of Bihar