Allowed¶22

Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, v. The State of Bihar through The Collector,Patna Collectorate,Patna

Patna HC18 Jul 2025MJC/1337/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Restoration of writ petition dismissed for default; MJC No.1337 of 2025; CWJC No.8297 of 2018 restored to original file; BIADA (Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority) v. State of Bihar and others; non-compliance with order dated 03.03.2025; notice not sent within time to corrected address of opposite party No. 4; extension of time by two weeks; Patna High Court; decided 18-07-2025 by Dr. Anshuman, J.; BIADA Act, 1974 referred in cause title; no precedent cases cited; no quantum involved.

What did the court decide?

Restoration of CWJC No. 8297 of 2018 to its original file, together with a two-week extension (from 18-07-2025) of the time granted vide order dated 03.03.2025. ¶22

Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Vs The State of Bihar through The Collector,Patna Collectorate,Patna — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1337 of 2025 In

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8297 of 2018

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, a body incorporated by the BIADA Act, 1974 having its Head Office at Udyog Bhawan, East of Gandhi Maidan, Patna-800 001 and represented through its Managing Director.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar through The Collector,Patna Collectorate,Patna P.OBankipur,Town and District-Patna,Bihar.

¶8

The District Land Acquisition Officer, Patna Collectorate, Patna, P.OBankipur, District- Patna.

¶9

Alok Kumar (Dead) S/o Late Dineshwar Sharma, Resident of Village and P.O.- Amhara, P.S- Bihta, District- Patna.

¶10

Mahayajn Manish S/o Late Dineshwar Sharma, Resident of Village and P.O.- Amhara, P.S- Bihta, District- Patna.

¶11

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶12

======================================================

¶13

Appearance :

¶14

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Avinash Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Standing Counsel 25 ======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER

¶16

3 18-07-2025

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶18

counsel for the State.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present MJC application has been filed for restoration of the CWJC No. 8297 of 2018 which has been dismissed against the respondent No. 4 for non compliance of the order dated 03.03.2025 as notice could not be sent within time on his new and correct address.

¶20

The points mentioned due to non compliance of the

¶21

Patna High Court MJC No.1337 of 2025(3) dt.18-07-2025 2/2

¶22

order is hereby accepted and the present MJC petition is hereby allowed and CWJC No. 8297 of 2018 is restored to its original file.

¶23

Accordingly, the time granted to the petitioner vide order dated 03.03.2025 passed in CWJC No. 8297 of 2018 is hereby extended for further two weeks, counting from today.

¶24

(Dr. Anshuman, J.)

¶25

Aman Kumar/-

¶26

Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, v. The State of Bihar through The Collector,Patna Collectorate,Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, v. The State of Bihar through The Collector,Patna Collectorate,Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nishi Devi @ Nishi Kumari @ Nishi Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sangita Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Kapildev Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Atul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary

Ramesh Mahto @ Ramesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Lalu Soren, Vs The State of Bihar