This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12025 of 2016
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Suraj Narain Yadav, Adv For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raghwendra Kumar, SC-22
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
5 07-08-2025
Heard learned counsel Mr. Suraj Narain Yadav for the
petitioner and Mr. Raghwendra Kumar, learned SC-22 for the respondent-State.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that this case has become infructuous and, therefore, it may accordingly be disposed of.
3. As prayed for, this writ application is disposed of as having become infructuous.
(Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
kiran/- U
Suraj Yadav
Bhuttu Yadav @ Birendra Yadav
Durjan Yadav @ Ramesh Yadav
Maheshwar Yadav @ Mahesh Yadav
The State Of Bihar
Vibhuti Prasad Singh
Alok Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
