Dismissed a writ petition for demolition of illegal structures on government land as the application was filed by unauthorised persons on behalf of unlisted aggrieved parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5016 of 2016
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner No.1 : None For the Petitioner No.2 : Mr. Mahesh Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Nadeem Seraj- GP-5 Ms. Shalini, AC to GP-5
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
5 06-08-2025
No one appears on behalf of the petitioner no.1. Learned counsel, Mr. Mahesh Prasad, Advocate appears for petitioner no.2 and learned counsel for the respondent-State is present.
Patna High Court CWJC No.5016 of 2016(5) dt.06-08-2025 2/2
the road from the front side of the houses of Sri Vinod Saw and Sri Prit Manjhi, which as per the petitioners have been left deserted by the concerned contractor.
(Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
Prakash Narayan U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ application filed on behalf of undisclosed aggrieved parties is maintainable.
Sri Dilip Kumar and Another
The State Of Bihar
Alok Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
