Sunita Devi @ Sunita Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

“i. For the quashing of entire land acquisition proceeding by which land is being acquired for state highway 81 (Sakaddi to Nasriganj) in non compliance of the provision under section 5A and section 9 in pursuant to section 4 & 9 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 (hereinafter in short referred as L.A. Act, 1894).

¶26

ii. Further quashing of the said proceeding for non compliance of the provision of section '9' in pursuant to the declaration under section 6 as published on 28.02.2012 in daily news paper under L.A. Act, 1894.

¶27

Patna High Court CWJC No.10775 of 2017(2) dt.07-01-2025 2/3

¶28

iii. Further to declare that the land acquisition proceeding initiated under L.A. Act 1894 is lapsed on the ground in terms of section 24 of the New Act 2013 as the Right to Fair compensation and Transparency in land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. (hereinafter in short referred as R.F. C.T. L.A. R.R. Act, 2013) and still till date physical possession of the land in question has not been taken nor the compensation has been paid to the petitioner by the respondent.

¶29

iv. To declare that quantum of award has been made under either old or new Act is invalid in non compliance of provision of L.A. Act, 1894.

¶30

v. After the quashing of entire acquisition proceeding, direction be given to the respondent Authorities to initiate the fresh proceeding for the land in question under RFCTLARR Act, 2013 or to calculate and to determine the quantum of Award for the land in question accordance with the provision laid down under sec. 26 to 30 of the new Act 2013 or w.e.f. 01.01.2014 to the petitioners as so he submitted representation earlier to the respondents.

¶31

vi. Any other relief/ reliefs be granted to the petitioner as so he is entitled in eye of law.”

¶32

After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that present writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file proper and detailed representation / application before the competent authority / Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Authority (LARRA), Patna.

¶33

Learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that the compensation amount has already been deposited with LARRA and he has no objection with the prayer of the petitioner for grant of liberty to raise her grievances before the LARRA / competent Authority.

¶34

In view of the submissions made on behalf of the

¶35

Patna High Court CWJC No.10775 of 2017(2) dt.07-01-2025 3/3

¶36

petitioner, the present writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file proper and detailed representation / application before the competent authority / Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Authority (LARRA), Patna for redressal of her grievance(s) within a period of six weeks from today.

¶37

On filing the said representation / application by the petitioner within the said period, the same shall be disposed of after hearing the parties in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six months from the date of filing of such representation / application.

¶38

With the aforesaid observations and directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

¶39

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)

¶40

Ritik/-

¶41

U

Sunita Devi @ Sunita Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunita Devi @ Sunita Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bullet Sah @ Rahul Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Pradeep Dubey @ Pradeep Kumar Dubey Vs The State of Bihar

Ashok Sah @ Ashok Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Most. Lalmuni Kunwar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Brijnandan Prasad Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Badamiya Devi @ Sudama Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.