The High Court at Patna disposed of a writ application seeking quashing of a remission order and directions for release after the state produced proceedings showing the petitioner had been recommended for release.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.362 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-118 Year-2001 Thana- BIHAR District- Nalanda
======================================================
AJIT KUMAR @ AJIT PRASAD S/O HARISHCHANDRA PRASAD R/O VILLAGE- MEYAR, P.S- CHHABILAPUR, DISTT.- NALANDA AT BIHARSHARIF
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ratnakar Pandey For the Respondent/s : Mr.Ag ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
4 05-08-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned counsel for the State.
petitioner for quashing the order of the State Remission Board dated 14.12.2023 and the petitioner is also seeking a direction
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.362 of 2024(4) dt.05-08-2025 2/2
upon the respondent authorities for his pre-mature release in connection with Sessions Trial No. 394 of 2002 arising out of Bihar P.S. Case No. 118 of 2001.
taken on record.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-
U
Ajit Kumar @ Ajit Prasad
State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary
State Sentence Remission Board
Joint Secretary-Cum-Director(Administration) Home Department (Prison)
Secretary, Law Department
Additional Director General of Police
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
