Petitioner challenged a 2013 order taking cognizance in a Forbesganj PS case. The court held the application not maintainable since cognizance had been taken and permitted conversion into an appeal under Section 14A(2) SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act within one week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3101 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-235 Year-2010 Thana- FORBESGANJ District- Araria
======================================================
Bir Bahadur Singh late Ramdhari Singh Resident of Village- Barakajigna, P.S. Mirganj, District- Gopalganj, Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tej Pratap Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binay Krishna ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel for the State.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
anand/- U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application is maintainable where cognizance has already been taken by the impugned order dated 13.06.2013.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bir Bahadur Singh late Ramdhari Singh
The State of Bihar
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
