Mukesh Kumar Prasad v. the State of Bihar through Home Secretary, Bihar at Patna.

Patna HC7 Jul 2025CR. WJC/314/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court (Justice Sandeep Kumar, 07-07-2025) dismisses writ petition seeking direction for police action on petitioner's FIR and arrest of named accused in murder case (PS Case No. 269 of 2022, Kuchaikote, Gopalganj); petitioner granted liberty to seek redressal before the concerned Court below in light of Sakiri Vasu vs. State of U.P., (2008) 2 SCC 409.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned Court below for redressal of his grievances by way of filing a petition; any such petition to be considered by the Court below in accordance with law with appropriate orders to be passed. ¶20-21

Mukesh Kumar Prasad Vs the State of Bihar through Home Secretary, Bihar at Patna. — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.314 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-269 Year-2022 Thana- KUCHAIKOTE District- Gopalganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MUKESH KUMAR PRASAD S/O JATU SAH Resident of Village- Amwa Vijaypur, P.S.- Kuchaikot, District- Gopalganj.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH HOME SECRETARY, BIHAR AT PATNA. BIHAR

¶8

THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA. BIHAR

¶9

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GOPALGANJ. BIHAR

¶10

THE S.H.O. P.S. KUCHAIKOT, GOPALGANJ. BIHAR

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

======================================================

¶13

Appearance :

¶14

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shiv Sager Sharma For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sheo Shankar Prasad ======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶16

2 07-07-2025 Heard the parties.

¶17

This application has been filed on behalf of the

¶18

petitioner for the following relief:-

¶19

That this application is for direction/order to the respondents are illegally and arbitrarily have not take any action of the petitioner's F.I.R. and they have not arrested the named accused of murder case due to they have influenced by the named accused who are also criminals and antisocial element of the locality.

¶20

In view of the aforesaid prayer, this application is

¶21

dismissed with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned Court below for redressal of his grievances by way of filing a petition in his case in light of the Judgment of the

¶22

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.314 of 2023(2) dt.07-07-2025 2/2

¶23

Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Sakiri Vasu vs. State of

¶24

U.P., reported as (2008) 2 SCC 409 .

¶25