Kavita Devi v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Jan 2025CR. MISC./89240/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Cr. Misc. No. 89240 of 2024, order dt. 08-01-2025, Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya: regular bail allowed to petitioner Kavita Devi in PS Case No. 400 of 2024 (Patrakar Nagar/Chitragupta Nagar, Patna) under Sections 305, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (alleged theft of golden jewelry); custody since 28.07.2024; clean antecedents; lady petitioner; bail bonds Rs. 10,000 with two like sureties before JM 1st Class, Patna.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna, in connection with Patrakar Nagar (Chitragupta Nagar) P.S. Case No. 400 of 2024. ¶¶20

Kavita Devi Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89240 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-400 Year-2024 Thana- PATRAKARNAGAR District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Kavita Devi Wife of Sri Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Kumar Choudhary Resident of Mahatma Gandhi Nagar, Behind Punjab National Bank, Dhobi Gali, P.S.Agamkuan, District- Patna

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Manoj Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 08-01-2025

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner is in custody in connection with Patrakar Nagar (Chitragupta Nagar) P.S Case No. 400 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 305 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

¶15

As per allegation in the FIR, the informant has alleged that the petitioner has stolen golden jewelry from her house.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and she is in custody since 28.07.2024. He further submits that the petitioner was working as Maid in informant’s house. He further submits

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89240 of 2024(2) dt.08-01-2025 2/2

¶18

that the keys of almirah was disclosed by the informant herself to her Maid and informant had told to bring articles from the almirah. And some hot discussion took place between them and the present case has been lodged by the informant to teach lesson to her.

¶19

However, learned APP for the State oppose the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

¶20

On perusal of the FIR, impugned order and period of custody and clean antecedent and petitioner is lady, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Patna in connection with with Patrakar Nagar (Chitragupta Nagar) P.S Case No. 400 of 2024

¶21

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)

¶22

Sunnykr/- U

Kavita Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kavita Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Munna Ravidas @ Munna Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Raghunath Prasad @ Raghunath Yadav and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Manik Lal Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

The State of Bihar Vs M/s Baba Hans Construction Pvt. Ltd.

Sagar Rai @ Sagar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sintu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar