Sujit Yadav @ Sujit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 8384 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP For the Informant : Mr. Anil Kr. Sinha, Advocate (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 8793 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP For the Informant : Mr. Anil Kr. Sinha, Advocate Mr. Satyavir, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶22

ORAL ORDER

¶23

10 04-12-2025 Both these cases arise out of the same case i.e. Goh

¶24

P.S. Case No. 269 of 2024 and accordingly, they are being heard

¶25

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8384 of 2025(10) dt.04-12-2025 2/3

¶26

together and disposed of with this common order.

¶27

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶28

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in Goh P.S. Case No. 269 of 2024 registered under Sections 80(2), 103, 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.

¶29

As per allegation, marriage of informant’s sister was solemnized with petitioner, Sujit Kumar (Cr. Misc. No. 8793 of 2025) in the year 2019. It is further alleged that the petitioners assaulted and kill the informant’s sister on 14.09.2024 due to non-fulfillment of demand of Rs.2,50,000/- as dowry.

¶30

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. They are the persons of clean antecedent. It has further been submitted that independent witnesses, namely, Jai Prakash Kumar, Neeraj Kumar and Rajdeo Paswan have stated that the deceased suffered stomach ache and she was brought to hospital where she was declared dead. It has further been submitted in postmortem report, no internal or external injury was found on person of the deceased. The FSL report also shows that no poisonous substance was found in viscera and the death was found to be suspected.

¶31

On the other hand, learned counsel appearing on behalf

¶32

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8384 of 2025(10) dt.04-12-2025 3/3

¶33

of State as well as informant opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners and submitted that the accused persons committed dowry death of the deceased.

¶34

In postmortem report, no internal or external injury was found and in FSL report also no poisonous substance was found in body of the deceased.

¶35

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Goh P.S. Case No. 269 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/ 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023.

¶36

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶37

priyanka/-

¶38

U T

Sujit Yadav @ Sujit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sujit Yadav @ Sujit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pradeep Kumar @ Pradeep Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Laddu Singh @ Sameer Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Babita Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Bigani Devi @ Vigani Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Vakeel Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Punam Devi Vs The State of Bihar