Anticipatory bail sought in a shooting case under BNS and Arms Act sections; the court found the petitioner was the direct assailant who grievously injured the victim by gunshot, with the victim's statement implicating him, and rejected the bail plea.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14115 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-427 Year-2024 Thana- KUDRA District- Kaimur (Bhabua)
======================================================
Laddu Singh @ Sameer Singh S/o Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra Kumar Singh @ Jitendra Singh R/o Village- Tarahani, PS- Sonhan, District- Kaimur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
... ... Opposite Party/s
ORAL ORDER
7 03-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP
for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14115 of 2025(7) dt.03-12-2025 2/2
compromise has been arrived between the parties and the compromise petition has also been filed before the court below.
(ii) Round wound of posterior side of neck, right side.
Both the injuries are grievous in nature caused by gunshot.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
rishi/- U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, alleged to be the direct assailant who fired at and grievously injured the informant's son, deserves anticipatory bail.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Laddu Singh @ Sameer Singh
The State of Bihar
Nawneet Kumar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
