Allowed¶21

Dhananjay Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC9 Apr 2025CR. MISC./86701/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail granted; Patna High Court; CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86701 of 2024; Dhananjay Kumar v. State of Bihar; Sections 399, 402, 414 IPC; Sections 25(1b)a, 26, 35 Arms Act; Warsaliganj P.S. Case No. 114 of 2024, Nawada; custody since 13.03.2024; bail bond Rs. 10,000 with two like sureties before CJM Nawada; condition to cooperate in trial; decided 09-04-2025.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Nawada, in connection with Warsaliganj P.S. Case No. 114 of 2024, subject to cooperation in the trial. ¶21

Dhananjay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86701 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-114 Year-2024 Thana- WARISLIGANJ District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Dhananjay Kumar Son of Sri Devendra Singh @ Virendra Singh Resident of village- Amni, PS- Mansi, District- Khagaria

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Chandan Kumar Kashyap For the State Mr. J.N.Thakur, APP

¶9

======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 09-04-2025

¶13

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶14

This is an application for regular bail on behalf

¶15

of the petitioner for the offences alleged under Sections 399, 402 & 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1b)a/26/35 of the Arms Act, registered in connection with Warsaliganj P.S.Case No. 114 of 2024.

¶16

As per allegation, the petitioner along with his other associates was planning to carry out illegal activities.

¶17

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated. Nothing was recovered from the possession of the petitioner, except one mobile set, which was of the informant

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86701 of 2024(3) dt.09-04-2025 2/2

¶19

himself. Learned counsel has also submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 13.03.2024 and in all the cases mentioned in para-3 of the bail petition, he is on bail.

¶20

On the other hand, Mr. J.N. Thakur, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶21

Considering the above facts and circumstances, specially the period of incarceration, which is more than a year, let the petitioner, above-named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Nawada in connection with Warsaliganj P.S.Case No. 114 of 2024, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court.

¶22

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶23

HR/-

¶24

U T

Dhananjay Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhananjay Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Umesh Singh @ Umesh Prasad Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Lal Babu Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ram Pujan Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Rabil Yadav @ Ravindra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Kumar Yadav @ Sanjay Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sharavan Kumar Pathak @ Shravan Kumar Pathak @ Rimjhim Pathak Vs The State of Bihar