Dismissed¶16

Santosh Mandal v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Jan 2025CR. MISC./79957/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; Criminal Miscellaneous No.79957 of 2024; Santosh Mandal v. The State of Bihar; regular bail rejected; PS Case No. 46 of 2023, P.S. Pirpainti, District Bhagalpur; offences under sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 504, 506, 307 and 302 IPC; fatal lathi-danda-iron rod assault on informant's father; FIR names petitioner with iron rod allegation corroborated by post mortem report; defence plea of general and omnibus allegation and fall from roof; clean antecedent; charge sheet filed; custody since 29.3.2023; decided 24-01-2025 by Honourable Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh.

What did the court decide?

Considering the nature of accusation, the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner is rejected. ¶16

Santosh Mandal Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79957 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-46 Year-2023 Thana- PIRPAINTI District- Bhagalpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Santosh Mandal Son of Niranjan Mandal R/O Vill.- Mustafapur Chaukhandi, P.S.- Pirpainti, Bakharpur, Dist.- Bhagalpur.

¶5

... ... Petitioner

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Gopal Prasad Roy, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Tapeshwar Sharma, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶7

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶8

2 24-01-2025

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

¶10

The petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered

¶11

for the offence punishable under sections147, 149, 341, 323, 504, 506, 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

As per the prosecution case, petitioner and other named accused persons assaulted father of the informant with lathi, danda and iron rod due to which he sustained injuries and fell down and became unconscious and died during treatment.

¶13

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that allegation of assault is general and omnibus against this petitioner and no specific overt act has been alleged against him. As a matter of fact, father of informant sustained injuries due to fall from the roof of his house. Petitioner claims clean antecedent. Charge sheet has already been filed. Petitioner is in custody since 29.3.2023.

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79957 of 2024(2) dt.24-01-2025 2/2

¶15

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail. He submits that the petitioner is named in the FIR with specific allegation that he assaulted the victim with iron rod which is also corroborated in the post mortem report of the deceased.

¶16

Considering the nature of accusation, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.

¶17

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶18

Shashi

¶19

U T

Santosh Mandal v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh Mandal v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Golu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Dipak Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Chhatish Sharma @ Chhatish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kangresh Yadav @ Kangresh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ashok Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Sharif @ Md. Sarif Vs The State of Bihar