Allowed¶20

Md. Sharif @ Md. Sarif v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Jan 2025CR. MISC./79742/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Cr. Misc. No. 79742 of 2024, oral order dated 24-01-2025, Prabhat Kumar Singh, J. Regular bail under S. 395 IPC in Pothia PS Case No. 72/2024 (Kishanganj); alleged loot of seized cattle linked to Kurlikot PS Case No. 16/2024; charge sheet filed; custody since 28.8.2024; APP for State opposed; bail granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with two like sureties before CJM Kishanganj. No precedents discussed.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner(s) enlarged on regular bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj, in Pothia Police Station Case No. 72 of 2024. ¶20

Md. Sharif @ Md. Sarif Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79742 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2024 Thana- POTHIYA District- Kishanganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Sharif @ Md. Sarif Son of Alam Resident of Village- Khatkhatti, PS -Kurlikot, Distt.- Kishanganj

¶5

Shamshad @ Md. Samshad Alam @ Samshad Son of Md. Salimuddin @ Salmu Resident of Village- Gulshanbhita, Piprithan Churli,Thakurganj, P.S.Kurlikot,Distt.- Kishanganj

¶6

Saddam @ Md. Saddam Son of Farooque Resident of Village- Kurlikot, P.S.- Kurlikot, Distt.- Kishanganj

¶7

... ... Petitioner/s

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State of Bihar

¶10

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Diwakar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Madhura Nand Jha, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 24-01-2025

¶14

Heard learned counsels for the parties.

¶15

The petitioners seek regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

As per prosecution case, allegation against these petitioners is to commit loot of cattle of informant who was carrying the seized cattle in connection with Kurlikot P.S. Case No. 16 of 2024.

¶17

It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of these petitioners. Cattle has been recovered from Adiwasi Tola, Suhagi which is far away from the house of the petitioners. Charge sheet has already been filed. Petitioners claim clean antecedents. Petitioners are in custody since 28.8.2024.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79742 of 2024(2) dt.24-01-2025 2/2

¶19

On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts of the case, prayer for regular bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj in Pothia Police Station Case No. 72 of 2024.

¶21

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶22

Shashi

¶23

U T

Md. Sharif @ Md. Sarif v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Sharif @ Md. Sarif v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Golu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Dipak Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Chhatish Sharma @ Chhatish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kangresh Yadav @ Kangresh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ashok Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Mandal Vs The State of Bihar