Dismissed¶24

Sintu Poddar @ Sintu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 May 2025CR. MISC./79296/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application (apprehension of arrest) rejected — POCSO rape case, Nathnagar P.S. Case No. 24 of 2024 / POCSO Case No. 09 of 2024, Bhagalpur; Sections 341, 323, 376, 506 IPC and Section 4/6 POCSO Act; victim's statements under Sections 161/164 Cr.P.C. (180/183 B.N.S.S., 2023) corroborate FIR; victim's age ascertained 12-14 years; no external or internal injury in medical report; petitioner in custody since 17.05.2024, no criminal antecedents, charge-sheet filed; direction to Trial Court to conclude trial preferably within six months; Khatim Reza, J.; Patna High Court; decided 08-05-2025.

What did the court decide?

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the court was not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. ¶23

Sintu Poddar @ Sintu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79296 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-24 Year-2024 Thana- NATHNAGAR District- Bhagalpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SINTU PODDAR @ SINTU KUMAR S/o Bangtu Poddar @ Bantu Poddar R/o vill - Madhopur, P.S. - Nathnagar, Distt. - Bhagalpur

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Anita Devi W/o Anil Mandal R/o vill - Madhopur, P.S. - Nathnagar, Distt. - Bhagalpur

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

======================================================

¶11

Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP For the informant : ======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER

¶14

5 08-05-2025

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned

¶16

A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

¶17

The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with POCSO Case No. 09 of 2024 (arising out of Nathnagar P.S. Case No. 24 of 2024) dated 09.01.2024, instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 376, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4/6 of the POCSO Act.

¶18

The FIR has been lodged against sole accused (petitioner) against whom there is allegation of rape with the niece of the informant.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79296 of 2024(5) dt.08-05-2025 2/3

¶21

case. It is further submitted that the victim was medically examined but there was no external or internal injury found on the body of victim. Therefore, the medical report does not support the case of prosecution. Lastly, it has been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 17.05.2024 having no criminal antecedents and charge-sheet has been submitted in the case.

¶22

Learned A.P.P. and learned counsel for the vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submitted that there is a specific allegation of rape against the petitioner. The contents of FIR have been supported by the victim in her statement under Sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C.(180 and 183 of the B.N.S.S., 2023) and in the medical report, her age was ascertained by the doctor to be between 12-14 years.

¶23

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶24

Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

¶25

However, the learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and take all endeavour to conclude the trial at the earliest, preferably, within a period of six (6) months from

¶26

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79296 of 2024(5) dt.08-05-2025 3/3

¶27

the date of receipt or production of a copy of this order.

¶28

(Khatim Reza, J)

¶29

Sankalp/-

¶30

U T

Sintu Poddar @ Sintu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sintu Poddar @ Sintu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mantu Rai @ Mantu @ Satyendra Kumar Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Lothra Hansda @ Lothra Hasda Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Pasi Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Kumar Paswan @ Sanjay Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Monu Pandey @ Monu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shatrudhan Kumar Vs the Union of India