Allowed¶19

Vinay Kumar @ Binay Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Dec 2025CR. MISC./78958/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail allowed; CR. MISC. No.78958 of 2025; Patna High Court; Harish Kumar, J; decision dated 16-12-2025; FIR No.552 of 2025, Gaya Mufassil P.S.; Sections 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 190, 109, 191(3) BNS; Section 27 Arms Act; land dispute clash with firing; fair antecedents; Section 482(2) BNSS conditions; bail bond Rs. 10,000/- with two like sureties; one bailor own/close family member; CJM Gaya.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail - petitioner to be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks, on bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, subject to Section 482(2) BNSS conditions and with one bailor being an own/close family member of the petitioner. ¶19

Vinay Kumar @ Binay Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶19

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioner, apprehending arrest in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No.552 of 2025 (offences under Sections 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 190, 109, 191(3) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act), should be released on anticipatory bail.

¶13

Court's answer

Anticipatory bail granted: considering the submissions, the nature of accusation and the petitioner's fair antecedents, the petitioner is to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within four weeks, in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No.552 of 2025, subject to the condition laid down under Section 482(2) BNSS.

¶19

Ratio / Principle

Bail conditions: bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, with the further condition that one of the bailors shall be an own/close family member of the petitioner.

¶19

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Anticipatory bail - Patna High Court (Harish Kumar, J) allowed the petitioner's plea apprehending arrest in Muffasil (Gaya) P.S. Case No.552 of 2025, registered for offences under Sections 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 190, 109, 191(3) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act, arising from an alleged fight between members of two parties for supremacy over a land dispute in which some firing took place. Considering the nature of accusation and the fact that the petitioner bears fair antecedents, the Court directed release on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within four weeks, on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, subject to the condition laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, with the further condition that one of the bailors shall be an own/close family member of the petitioner.

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78958 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-552 Year-2025 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Vinay Kumar @ Binay Kumar Singh, S/O Gopal Singh Resident of MohallaLakhi Bagh, P.S.- Mufassil, District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Upendra Kumar, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 16-12-2025

¶12

Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No.552 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 190, 109, 191(3) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶14

The FIR has been instituted based on an information that members of two parties entered into a fight for supremacy on account of a land dispute, wherein some firing also took place and the local people are apprehending danger. The petitioner is said to be one of the persons who was involved in the fighting.

¶15

Learned Advocate for the petitioner contended that the entire case is based on suspicion of involvement of the petitioner in the crime. There is no specific accusation levelled against the petitioner, rather general and omnibus allegation has

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78958 of 2025(2) dt.16-12-2025 2/2

¶17

been levelled against four named accused persons and 15-20 unknown persons. In the said occurrence, none has sustained any injury and based on information that some firing took place between members of two sides for their dominance, the present FIR came to be instituted. The petitioner has absolutely fair antecedent and he has no concern with the alleged crime.

¶18

On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State opposed the bail application.

¶19

Having considered the submissions advanced by the learned Advocate for the respective parties and considering the nature of accusation and the fact that the petitioner bears fair antecedent, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No.552 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, with further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner.

¶20

(Harish Kumar, J)

¶21

rohit/- U T

Vinay Kumar @ Binay Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinay Kumar @ Binay Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Renu Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Rajeshwar Ram Vs The Chancellor of the Universities

Sushil Kumar Sinha Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Manti Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Sri Raj Nursing Training Institute Vs The State of Bihar