Anticipatory bail application arising from a Kishanganj complaint case dismissed for non-prosecution, as no one appeared for the petitioner on two consecutive dates and the court found the petitioner had lost interest in pursuing the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7886 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-459 Year-2022 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE DistrictKishanganj
======================================================
Sanjeev Nayak @ Sanjeev Kumar Son of Ramdev Nayak Resident of Village - Suriyari Tola, Post and P.S. - Pratapganj, District- Supaul, State- Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : N O N E For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rajendra Prasad Nat, Advocate Mr. R.Kumar, Advocate ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
consecutive date. However, counsel for State and opposite party no.2 are present.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
shashi/-
U T
Sanjeev Nayak @ Sanjeev Kumar
The State of Bihar
Priyanka Kumari
Prabhat Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
